Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Health Rep. 2019 Mar 20;30(3):12-23. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x201900300002-eng.
Sitting time and physical activity may be modifiable determinants of lung function. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect that replacing various movement behaviours has on lung function among individuals with and without obstructive lung disease.
For analysis, data were used from participants of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, recruited between 2012 and 2015. Lung function was assessed using spirometry. A modified version of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly was used to assess sitting time and physical activity levels. Isotemporal substitution analysis was performed to analyze the effects of replacing 30 minutes per day of one movement behaviour with another, keeping the total time constant. Analyses were run separately for individuals with an obstructive lung disease (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁] ⟨ 5th percentile lower limit of normal; n=3,398), and healthy adults (n=14,707).
When sitting time was replaced with 30 minutes per day of any type of physical activity or sleep, an increase in percent (%) of predicted FEV₁ (i.e., β=0.65, confidence interval [CI]: 0.43, 0.88 for replacing sitting time with strenuous or strengthening activity) was observed among healthy adults. Among adults with obstructive lung disease, replacing 30 minutes per day of sitting time or sleep duration with strenuous or strengthening activity was associated with an improvement in the percent of predicted FEV₁ (i.e., β=0.98, CI: 0.13, 1.82 for replacing sleep duration with strenuous or strengthening activity).
Replacing sitting time with physical activity leads to significant improvements in lung function among adults with an obstructive lung disease, as well as among adults without a respiratory disease.
坐姿时间和身体活动量可能是可改变的肺功能决定因素。本研究的目的是评估在患有和不患有阻塞性肺部疾病的个体中,用各种运动行为替代来替代对肺功能的影响。
为了分析,使用了 2012 年至 2015 年期间招募的加拿大老龄化纵向研究的参与者的数据。使用肺活量测定法评估肺功能。使用修改后的老年人体育活动量表评估坐姿时间和身体活动水平。等时替代分析用于分析每天用另一种运动行为替代 30 分钟的影响,保持总时间不变。分别针对患有阻塞性肺部疾病(哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或 1 秒用力呼气量 [FEV₁] ⟨正常下限第 5 百分位数;n=3398)和健康成年人(n=14707)进行分析。
当坐姿时间被每天 30 分钟的任何类型的体力活动或睡眠取代时,健康成年人的预测 FEV₁百分比增加(即 β=0.65,置信区间 [CI]:0.43,0.88,用剧烈或强化活动取代坐姿时间)。在患有阻塞性肺部疾病的成年人中,每天 30 分钟的坐姿时间或睡眠时间被剧烈或强化活动取代,与预测 FEV₁百分比的改善相关(即 β=0.98,CI:0.13,1.82,用剧烈或强化活动取代睡眠时间)。
用体力活动代替坐姿时间会显著改善患有阻塞性肺部疾病以及没有呼吸系统疾病的成年人的肺功能。