Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Nat Genet. 2019 May;51(5):772-776. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0383-1. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
In numerous applications, from working with animal models to mapping the genetic basis of human disease susceptibility, knowing whether a single disrupting mutation in a gene is likely to be deleterious is useful. With this goal in mind, a number of measures have been developed to identify genes in which protein-truncating variants (PTVs), or other types of mutations, are absent or kept at very low frequency in large population samples-genes that appear 'intolerant' to mutation. One measure in particular, the probability of being loss-of-function intolerant (pLI), has been widely adopted. This measure was designed to classify genes into three categories, null, recessive and haploinsufficient, on the basis of the contrast between observed and expected numbers of PTVs. Such population-genetic approaches can be useful in many applications. As we clarify, however, they reflect the strength of selection acting on heterozygotes and not dominance or haploinsufficiency.
在许多应用中,从使用动物模型到绘制人类疾病易感性的遗传基础,了解基因中的单个破坏突变是否可能具有危害性是很有用的。考虑到这一目标,已经开发了许多措施来识别蛋白质截断变异(PTV)或其他类型突变在大人群样本中不存在或保持非常低频率的基因——这些基因似乎对突变“不耐受”。特别是一种措施,即功能丧失不耐受的概率(pLI),已被广泛采用。该措施旨在根据观察到的和预期的 PTV 数量之间的差异,将基因分为三类,即无效、隐性和杂合不足。这种群体遗传学方法在许多应用中可能很有用。然而,正如我们所澄清的那样,它们反映了对杂合子起作用的选择强度,而不是显性或杂合不足。