Garg Kranti, Saini Varinder, Dhillon Ruchika, Agarwal Prakhar
Assistant Professor, Professor and Head, Junior Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, India.
Assistant Professor, Professor and Head, Junior Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Tuberc. 2019 Apr;66(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In drug resistant tuberculosis (DRTB) suspects, rifampicin resistance has always been prioritized, hence Cartridge Based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) is recommended under Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), India. However, since it doesn't detect isoniazid resistance, rifampicin sensitive patients with unknown isoniazid status may be erroneously treated as drug sensitive TB, leading to poor treatment outcomes and emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) TB. Hence isoniazid mono-resistance should be specifically looked for and treated as per recommendations. The objective of the present study, almost the first of its kind in India, was to evaluate the burden of isoniazid mono-resistance amongst patients diagnosed with DRTB and to study the association of different patient and disease related factors with treatment outcomes under the treatment regimen specific for isoniazid mono-resistance, started from January 1, 2017 in our state, under RNTCP.
It was a retrospective study which scrutinized medical records of 52 isoniazid mono-resistant TB patients started on treatment under RNTCP between January 1 to December 31, 2017. Necessary information on possible patient and disease related predicting factors like gender, age, type of mutation (katG/inhA), weight band (26-45 kg/46-70 kg), total serum protein/albumin levels, previous history of anti-tubercular treatment (ATT), history of smoking, HIV status, presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), presence of anemia, occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADR) during treatment and duration of intensive phase (IP), was retrieved. These factors were analyzed for their possible association with treatment outcomes.
Out of 103 DRTB patients enrolled, 50.5% (52/103) patients were diagnosed with isoniazid mono-resistance. 50/103 were MDR-TB and 1/103 were extensively-drug resistant TB (XDR-TB). Further analysis of these 52 isoniazid mono-resistant patients revealed:35 (67.3%) were males and 17 (32.7%) females. 27 (51.9%) patients were <30 years, 25 (48.1%) being ≥30 years of age. All patients were negative for HIV. 34/52 (65.4%) patients were declared cured, 15/52 were lost to follow up (LTFU) and 3/52 died (1 male, 2 females). Excluding these 3 patients who died, cure rates were significantly better in females (14/15 = 93.3%), with only 1/15 LTFU, than males (20/34 = 58.8% cure, 14/34 = 41.2% LTFU), (p = 0.019). Patients who were <30 years of age had significantly better cure rates (21/25 = 84%) with lesser LTFU's (4/25 = 16%), than those ≥30years of age (13/24 = 54.2% cure, 11/24 = 45.8% LTFU), (p = 0.032). Review of previous history of ATT revealed that 33 patients had primary isoniazid mono-resistance, 4 patients had previous history of being LTFU, 9 had recurrent TB and 3 were labeled as failure. Cure rates were significantly better in primary isoniazid mono-resistant patients (26/33 = 78.8%), than those with previous history of being LTFU(0/4), (p = 0.04). Type of mutation, weight band, total serum protein/albumin, history of smoking, presence of DM, presence of anemia, occurrence of ADR and duration of IP did not affect treatment outcomes.
Isoniazid mono-resistance formed a major chunk of DRTB, with majority of the patients detected with primary mono-resistance. Strategically framed treatment regimens for isoniazid mono-resistance under RNTCP in India are effective in a wide range of population. Still, there are high chances of LTFU/default, which needs to be addressed on priority. Male gender, age ≥30 years and being LTFU in the past are associated with poorer cure rates, hence should be paid special attention.
背景/目的:在耐药结核病(DRTB)疑似病例中,利福平耐药一直是首要关注的问题,因此印度修订后的国家结核病控制规划(RNTCP)推荐使用基于卡式的核酸扩增检测(CBNAAT)。然而,由于该检测无法检测异烟肼耐药情况,异烟肼状态未知的利福平敏感患者可能会被错误地当作药物敏感结核病进行治疗,从而导致治疗效果不佳以及多重耐药(MDR)结核病的出现。因此,应特别关注异烟肼单耐药情况,并根据建议进行治疗。本研究在印度几乎是同类研究中的首例,其目的是评估诊断为DRTB的患者中异烟肼单耐药的负担,并研究在2017年1月1日起在我们邦根据RNTCP针对异烟肼单耐药制定的治疗方案下,不同患者和疾病相关因素与治疗结果之间的关联。
这是一项回顾性研究,详细审查了2017年1月1日至12月31日期间在RNTCP下开始治疗的52例异烟肼单耐药结核病患者的病历。收集了关于可能的患者和疾病相关预测因素的必要信息,如性别、年龄、突变类型(katG/inhA)、体重范围(26 - 45千克/46 - 70千克)、总血清蛋白/白蛋白水平、既往抗结核治疗(ATT)史、吸烟史、HIV状态、糖尿病(DM)的存在、贫血的存在、治疗期间药物不良反应(ADR)的发生以及强化期(IP)的持续时间。分析这些因素与治疗结果之间可能的关联。
在纳入的103例DRTB患者中,50.5%(52/103)的患者被诊断为异烟肼单耐药。50/103例为MDR - TB,1/103例为广泛耐药结核病(XDR - TB)。对这52例异烟肼单耐药患者的进一步分析显示:35例(67.3%)为男性,17例(32.7%)为女性。27例(51.9%)患者年龄<30岁,25例(48.1%)患者年龄≥30岁。所有患者HIV检测均为阴性。34/52(65.4%)例患者被宣布治愈,15/52例失访(LTFU),3/52例死亡(1例男性,2例女性)。排除这3例死亡患者后,女性的治愈率(14/15 = 93.3%)显著高于男性(20/34 = 58.8%治愈,14/34 = 41.2%失访),(p = 0.019)。年龄<30岁的患者治愈率(21/25 = 84%)显著高于年龄≥30岁的患者(13/24 = 54.2%治愈,11/24 = 45.8%失访),(p = 0.032)。回顾既往ATT史发现,33例患者为原发性异烟肼单耐药,4例患者有既往失访史,9例有复发性结核病,3例被标记为治疗失败。原发性异烟肼单耐药患者的治愈率(26/33 = 78.8%)显著高于有既往失访史的患者(0/4),(p = 0.04)。突变类型、体重范围、总血清蛋白/白蛋白、吸烟史、DM的存在、贫血的存在、ADR的发生以及IP的持续时间均未影响治疗结果。
异烟肼单耐药构成了DRTB的主要部分,大多数患者检测为原发性单耐药。印度RNTCP针对异烟肼单耐药制定的策略性治疗方案在广泛人群中是有效的。然而,失访/治疗中断的可能性仍然很高,这需要优先解决。男性、年龄≥30岁以及既往失访与较差的治愈率相关,因此应予以特别关注。