Suppr超能文献

自我报告的疼痛特征和床边检查可用于评估疼痛机制吗?对神经病理性疼痛问卷和定量感觉测试结果的分析。

Can self-reported pain characteristics and bedside test be used for the assessment of pain mechanisms? An analysis of results of neuropathic pain questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing.

机构信息

Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.

Institut of Medical Informatics and Statistics, University of Kiel, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Pain. 2019 Sep;160(9):2093-2104. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001601.

Abstract

Hyperalgesia and allodynia are frequent in neuropathic pain. Some pain questionnaires such as the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) and the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) include self-assessment or bedside testing of hyperalgesia/allodynia. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent LANSS and NPS data are congruent with findings on quantitative sensory testing (QST). Self-reported presence of dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) and descriptors of hot, cold, or deep ongoing pain (the NPS and LANSS) as well as bedside findings of mechanical allodynia (LANSS) were compared with signs of DMA and thermal hyperalgesia on QST in 617 patients with neuropathic pain. Self-reported abnormal skin sensitivity (LANSS) showed a moderate concordance with DMA during bedside test (67.9%, κ = 0.391) or QST (52.8%, κ = 0.165). Receiver operating curve analysis for self-reported DMA yielded similar area-under-the-curve values for the LANSS (0.65, confidence interval: 0.59%-0.97%) and NPS (0.71, confidence interval: 0.66%-0.75%) with high sensitivity but low specificity. Self-reported deep pain intensity was higher in patients with blunt pressure hyperalgesia, but not in patients with DMA or thermal hyperalgesia. No correlations were observed between self-reported hot or cold pain quality and thermal hyperalgesia on QST. Self-reported abnormal skin sensitivity has a high sensitivity to identify patients with DMA, but its low specificity indicates that many patients mean something other than DMA when reporting this symptom. Self-reported deep pain is related to deep-tissue hypersensitivity, but thermal qualities of ongoing pain are not related to thermal hyperalgesia. Questionnaires mostly evaluate the ongoing pain experience, whereas QST mirrors sensory functions. Therefore, both methods are complementary for pain assessment.

摘要

痛觉过敏和感觉异常在神经病理性疼痛中很常见。一些疼痛问卷,如莱斯特评估感觉神经症状和体征量表(LANSS)和神经病理性疼痛量表(NPS),包括对痛觉过敏/感觉异常的自我评估或床边测试。本研究的目的是确定 LANSS 和 NPS 数据与定量感觉测试(QST)结果的一致性程度。将自我报告的动态机械性感觉异常(DMA)和热、冷或深部持续性疼痛的描述符(NPS 和 LANSS)以及床边机械性感觉异常(LANSS)的发现与 QST 中 DMA 和热痛觉过敏的迹象进行比较在 617 例神经病理性疼痛患者中。自我报告的异常皮肤敏感性(LANSS)在床边测试(67.9%,κ=0.391)或 QST(52.8%,κ=0.165)中与 DMA 有中度一致性。用于自我报告 DMA 的接收器操作曲线分析得出了 LANSS(0.65,置信区间:0.59%-0.97%)和 NPS(0.71,置信区间:0.66%-0.75%)的相似曲线下面积值,具有高灵敏度但特异性低。有钝压痛觉过敏的患者自我报告的深部疼痛强度较高,但 DMA 或热痛觉过敏的患者则没有。自我报告的热或冷疼痛质量与 QST 上的热痛觉过敏之间没有观察到相关性。自我报告的异常皮肤敏感性对识别 DMA 患者具有高灵敏度,但低特异性表明许多患者在报告此症状时并非指 DMA。自我报告的深部疼痛与深部组织高敏感性有关,但持续性疼痛的热性质与热痛觉过敏无关。问卷主要评估持续性疼痛体验,而 QST 则反映感觉功能。因此,两种方法在疼痛评估中是互补的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验