Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; VAH Ring Trial Steering Gremium of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany.
Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; VAH Ring Trial Steering Gremium of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany; Disinfectant Commission 4+4-Group of the Association for Applied Hygiene (VAH), Bonn, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Sporicidal surface disinfection is recommended to control transmission of Clostridium difficile in healthcare facilities. EN 17126 provides a method to determine the sporicidal activity in suspension and has been approved as a European standard. In addition, a sporicidal surface test has been proposed.
To determine the interlaboratory reproducibility of a test method for evaluating the susceptibility of a C. difficile spore preparation to a biocidal formulation following the 4-field test (EN 16615 methodology).
Nine laboratories participated. C. difficile NCTC 13366 spores were used. Glutaraldehyde (1% and 6%; 15 min) and peracetic acid (PAA; 0.01% and 0.04%; 15 min) were used to determine the spores' susceptibility in suspension in triplicate.
One-percent glutaraldehyde revealed a mean decimal log reduction of 1.03 with variable results in the nine laboratories (0.37-1.49) and a reproducibility of 0.38. The effect of 6% glutaraldehyde was stronger (mean: 2.05; range: 0.96-4.29; reproducibility: 0.86). PAA revealed similar results. An exemplary biocidal formulation based on 5% PAA was used at 0.5% (non-effective concentration) and 4% (effective concentration) to determine the sporicidal efficacy (4-field test) under clean conditions in triplicate with a contact time of 15 min. When used at 0.5% it demonstrated an overall log reduction of 2.68 (range: 2.35-3.57) and at 4% of 4.61 (range: 3.82-5.71). The residual contamination on the three primarily uncontaminated test fields was <50 cfu/25 cm in one out of nine laboratories (0.5%) and in seven out of nine laboratories (4%).
The interlaboratory reproducibility seems to be robust.
杀菌表面消毒被推荐用于控制医疗机构中艰难梭菌的传播。EN 17126 提供了一种在悬浮液中测定杀菌活性的方法,并已被批准为欧洲标准。此外,还提出了一种杀菌表面测试方法。
按照 4 字段测试(EN 16615 方法),确定评估艰难梭菌孢子制剂对杀菌配方的敏感性的测试方法的实验室间重现性。
9 个实验室参与。使用艰难梭菌 NCTC 13366 孢子。戊二醛(1%和 6%;15 分钟)和过氧乙酸(PAA;0.01%和 0.04%;15 分钟)用于在悬浮液中重复三次测定孢子的易感性。
1%戊二醛显示出 1.03 的平均十进制对数减少,9 个实验室的结果各不相同(0.37-1.49),重现性为 0.38。6%戊二醛的效果更强(平均值:2.05;范围:0.96-4.29;重现性:0.86)。PAA 显示出类似的结果。基于 5%PAA 的示例杀菌配方在 0.5%(非有效浓度)和 4%(有效浓度)下,在清洁条件下以 15 分钟的接触时间重复进行三次,用于确定杀菌功效(4 字段测试)。当使用 0.5%时,它表现出 2.68 的总体对数减少(范围:2.35-3.57),当使用 4%时,它表现出 4.61 的对数减少(范围:3.82-5.71)。在 9 个实验室中的 1 个(0.5%)和 9 个实验室中的 7 个(4%),三个主要无污染测试区域的残留污染<50cfu/25cm。
实验室间重现性似乎很强。