Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术中全身麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉对脐静脉血气值影响的比较:一项双盲、随机、对照研究。

Comparison of Effects of General Anesthesia and Combined Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery on Umbilical Cord Blood Gas Values: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Jingzhou, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, China (mainland).

Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jul 16;25:5272-5279. doi: 10.12659/MSM.914160.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of general anesthesia in cesarean section on the umbilical cord blood gas values and intraoperative hemodynamics of parturient women. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 112 parturient women who received cesarean section were eventually randomized into 2 groups, GA (general anesthesia) group (n=56), and SE (combined spinal and epidural anesthesia) group (n=56). The umbilical cord blood gas values, postpartum Apgar score, intraoperative blood loss, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total operative time, time intervals from anesthesia to delivery and from skin incision to delivery, the incidences of adverse reactions and neonatal asphyxia, and the postoperative patient satisfaction were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in total operative time, Apgar score, neonatal asphyxia rate, umbilical arterial and venous cord blood gas values, intraoperative blood loss, and time interval from skin incision to delivery (all P˃0.05). The GA group was significantly shorter in the time interval from anesthesia to delivery than the SE group (P˂0.05). The incidences of nausea, vomiting, and chills in the GA group were significantly lower than those in the SE group (all P˂0.05). The GA group was significantly higher in postoperative patient satisfaction than the SE group (P˂0.05). CONCLUSIONS General anesthesia has little impact on the umbilical cord blood gas values and Apgar score, and ensures better hemodynamic stability in cesarean section. Moreover, general anesthesia is characterized by rapid induction and is therefore valuable for use in clinical procedures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析剖宫产术中全身麻醉对产妇脐带血血气值和术中血液动力学的影响。

材料与方法

共 112 例剖宫产产妇最终随机分为两组:全身麻醉(GA)组(n=56)和联合脊髓-硬膜外麻醉(SE)组(n=56)。比较两组产妇的脐带血气值、产后 Apgar 评分、术中出血量、平均动脉压、心率、总手术时间、麻醉至分娩时间、皮肤切开至分娩时间、不良反应和新生儿窒息发生率以及术后患者满意度。

结果

两组总手术时间、Apgar 评分、新生儿窒息率、脐动脉和脐静脉血气值、术中出血量、皮肤切开至分娩时间差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。GA 组麻醉至分娩时间明显短于 SE 组(P<0.05)。GA 组恶心、呕吐和寒战的发生率明显低于 SE 组(均 P<0.05)。GA 组术后患者满意度明显高于 SE 组(P<0.05)。

结论

全身麻醉对脐带血血气值和 Apgar 评分影响较小,能确保剖宫产术中血液动力学更稳定。此外,全身麻醉诱导迅速,因此在临床操作中具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b2/6652376/65af77b807a2/medscimonit-25-5272-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验