Suppr超能文献

快速直接 E 试验对阳性血培养物进行即时抗菌药敏评估。

Assessment of rapid direct E-test on positive blood culture for same-day antimicrobial susceptibility.

机构信息

Microbiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Oct;50(4):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00139-6. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Early and appropriated antimicrobial therapy showed to positively impact on the clinical improvement of septic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate E-test methodology to obtain rapid results of antimicrobial susceptibility, starting directly from blood culture bottles positive to Gram-negative monomicrobial flora.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and five blood culture samples positive to Gram-negative rods at the microscopic examination were collected. Bacterial identification from early subculture on blood agar after 4 h incubation and rapid direct E-test from blood culture broth were performed on every sample. Antibiotics MIC were achieved after 5-6 h of incubation. Resulting MIC values were compared with those obtained with reference E-test from the overnight subculture. Categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Comparison between rapid direct E-test and reference E-test showed CA ranging from 95.1 to 100 % and 88.2 to 100 % for Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, respectively. Rapid direct E-test showed an overall EA of 80.1 %, revealing different EA rates for the tested antibiotics. Among carbapenemase-producing EB, CA of 87.5 % and EA of 75.5 % for MP were achieved.

DISCUSSION

The same-day communication of the antimicrobial susceptibility represents an important challenge in the multidrug-resistance era. Despite not being able to anticipate actual MIC values, the rapid direct E-test may be useful to obtain preliminary AST results in 5-6 h, especially if used in association with phenotypic or genotypic tests to identify the main resistance mechanisms.

摘要

简介

早期和适当的抗菌治疗已被证明对脓毒症患者的临床改善有积极影响。本研究旨在评估 E 试验方法,以从革兰氏阴性单微生物菌群阳性的血培养瓶中直接获得快速的抗菌药物敏感性结果。

材料和方法

收集了 105 份革兰氏阴性杆菌在显微镜检查下阳性的血培养样本。每份样本均在 4 小时孵育后从早期血琼脂平板上进行细菌鉴定,并在血培养肉汤中进行快速直接 E 试验。孵育 5-6 小时后获得抗生素 MIC 值。将所得 MIC 值与过夜亚培养的参考 E 试验结果进行比较。评估分类一致性 (CA) 和基本一致性 (EA)。

结果

快速直接 E 试验与参考 E 试验比较,肠杆菌科 (EB) 的 CA 为 95.1%至 100%,非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的 CA 为 88.2%至 100%。快速直接 E 试验的总体 EA 为 80.1%,显示出不同的测试抗生素的 EA 率。在产碳青霉烯酶的 EB 中,MP 的 CA 为 87.5%,EA 为 75.5%。

讨论

当天报告抗菌药物敏感性是多药耐药时代的一个重要挑战。尽管无法预测实际 MIC 值,但快速直接 E 试验可能有助于在 5-6 小时内获得初步 AST 结果,特别是如果与表型或基因型检测结合使用,以确定主要的耐药机制。

相似文献

1
Assessment of rapid direct E-test on positive blood culture for same-day antimicrobial susceptibility.
Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Oct;50(4):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00139-6. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

本文引用的文献

2
3
Prospective evaluation of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on Mueller-Hinton rapid-SIR directly on blood cultures.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jan;93(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.016. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
7
Diagnosis of bloodstream infections from positive blood cultures and directly from blood samples: recent developments in molecular approaches.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):944-955. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 19.
8
Towards precision medicine in sepsis: a position paper from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1264-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验