Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Blood Adv. 2019 Nov 12;3(21):3322-3332. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000328.
Recent work has identified distinct molecular subgroups of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with implications for disease classification and prognosis. AML with mutated NPM1 (AML-NPM1) represents a distinct entity in the revised 2017 World Health Organization classification, but relatively little work has examined the clinical significance of phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity within this group. A multi-institutional cohort of 239 AML-NPM1 cases included 3 phenotypic groups: cases with blasts showing monocytic differentiation (n = 93; monocytic AML-NPM1), cases lacking monocytic differentiation (n = 72; myeloid AML-NPM1), and cases where blasts were negative for both CD34 and HLA-DR (n = 74; double-negative [DN] AML-NPM1). Genotypic diversity typical of AML-NPM1 was seen, with comutations occurring most commonly in DNA methylation genes (81% of cases), FLT3 (48%; including internal tandem duplication and tyrosine kinase domain mutations), and RAS pathway genes (30%). However, the comutation pattern differed by blast phenotype. TET2 and IDH1/2 mutations were significantly more common in DN AML-NPM1 (96% of cases) than in myeloid (39%) or monocytic AML-NPM1 (48%; P < .0001). Conversely, DNMT3A mutations were significantly less common in DN AML-NPM1 (27%) than in myeloid (44%) or monocytic cases (54%; P = .002). Furthermore, the 3 phenotypic groups showed significant differences in outcome, with DN AML-NPM1 showing significantly longer relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (64.7 and 66.5 months, respectively) than monocytic AML-NPM1 (RFS, 20.6 months; OS, 44.3 months) or myeloid AML-NPM1 (RFS, 8.4 months; OS, 20.2 months; P < .0001 and P = .01 for RFS and OS, respectively). Our findings highlight biologic differences within immunophenotypically defined subgroups of NPM1-mutated AML that may impart prognostic significance.
最近的研究已经确定了急性髓系白血病(AML)的不同分子亚群,这对疾病分类和预后具有重要意义。在修订后的 2017 年世界卫生组织分类中,具有突变型 NPM1 的 AML(AML-NPM1)代表了一个独特的实体,但相对较少的工作研究了该组内表型和遗传异质性的临床意义。一个多机构的 239 例 AML-NPM1 病例队列包括 3 个表型组:具有单核细胞分化特征的原始细胞(n = 93;单核细胞 AML-NPM1)、缺乏单核细胞分化的病例(n = 72;髓系 AML-NPM1)和原始细胞既对 CD34 又对 HLA-DR 呈阴性的病例(n = 74;双阴性 [DN] AML-NPM1)。AML-NPM1 常见的基因型多样性,最常见的是共突变发生在 DNA 甲基化基因(81%的病例)、FLT3(48%;包括内部串联重复和酪氨酸激酶结构域突变)和 RAS 通路基因(30%)。然而,共突变模式因原始细胞表型而异。TET2 和 IDH1/2 突变在 DN AML-NPM1(96%的病例)中比在髓系(39%)或单核细胞 AML-NPM1(48%;P <.0001)中更为常见。相反,DNAML-NPM1 中 DNMT3A 突变明显较少(27%),而在髓系(44%)或单核细胞病例中(54%;P =.002)则更为常见。此外,这 3 个表型组在结局上有显著差异,DN AML-NPM1 的无复发生存(RFS)和总生存(OS)显著延长(分别为 64.7 和 66.5 个月),明显长于单核细胞 AML-NPM1(RFS,20.6 个月;OS,44.3 个月)或髓系 AML-NPM1(RFS,8.4 个月;OS,20.2 个月;P <.0001 和 P =.01 分别用于 RFS 和 OS)。我们的研究结果强调了在免疫表型定义的 NPM1 突变型 AML 亚组内存在生物学差异,这些差异可能具有预后意义。