University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 20;38(3):248-256. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01294. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
In an update of the randomized, open-label, phase III European Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) Elderly trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00209209), published in 2012, we aimed to confirm results on long-term outcome focusing on efficacy and safety of long-term use of rituximab maintenance.
Five hundred sixty patients with newly diagnosed MCL underwent a first random assignment between rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) induction, followed by a second random assignment in 316 responders between rituximab and interferon alfa maintenance, to be continued until progression. We compared progression-free survival from the second randomization and overall survival (OS) from the first or second randomizations.
After a median follow-up time of 7.6 years, the previously described difference in OS between the induction arms persisted (median, 6.4 years after R-CHOP [n = 280] 3.9 years after R-FC [n = 280]; = .0054). Patients responding to R-CHOP had median progression-free survival and OS times of 5.4 and 9.8 years, respectively, when randomly assigned to rituximab (n = 87), compared with 1.9 years ( < .001) and 7.1 years ( = .0026), respectively, when randomly assigned to interferon alfa (n = 97). In 58% and 32% of patients treated with R-CHOP, rituximab maintenance was still ongoing 2 and 5 years from start of maintenance, respectively. After R-FC, rituximab maintenance was associated with an unexpectedly high cumulative incidence of death in remission (22% at 5 years). Toxicity of rituximab maintenance was low after R-CHOP (grade 3-4 leukopenia or infection < 5%) but more prominent in patients on rituximab maintenance after R-FC, in whom grade 3-4 leukopenia (up to 40%) and infections were frequent (up to 15%).
The excellent results of R-CHOP followed by rituximab maintenance until progression for older patients with MCL persisted in a mature follow-up. Prolongation of rituximab maintenance beyond 2 years is effective and safe.
在一项 2012 年发表的、针对欧洲套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)老年患者的随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00209209)的更新中,我们旨在确认长期疗效和安全性方面的结果,重点关注长期使用利妥昔单抗维持治疗。
560 例新诊断的 MCL 患者在诱导治疗阶段接受了第一次随机分组,分别接受利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)或利妥昔单抗、氟达拉滨和环磷酰胺(R-FC)治疗,316 例缓解患者在第二次随机分组中分别接受利妥昔单抗或干扰素-α维持治疗,直到疾病进展。我们比较了第二次随机分组后的无进展生存期和第一次或第二次随机分组后的总生存期(OS)。
中位随访时间为 7.6 年后,诱导治疗组之间的 OS 差异与之前描述的一致(R-CHOP 组[ n = 280]的中位 OS 为 6.4 年,R-FC 组[ n = 280]的中位 OS 为 3.9 年; =.0054)。对 R-CHOP 治疗有反应的患者,随机分配至利妥昔单抗组的中位无进展生存期和 OS 时间分别为 5.4 年和 9.8 年,而随机分配至干扰素-α组的中位无进展生存期和 OS 时间分别为 1.9 年( <.001)和 7.1 年( =.0026)。在接受 R-CHOP 治疗的患者中,分别有 58%和 32%的患者在开始维持治疗后 2 年和 5 年仍在接受利妥昔单抗维持治疗。在接受 R-FC 治疗的患者中,利妥昔单抗维持治疗与缓解期内意外高的累积死亡率相关(5 年时为 22%)。R-CHOP 后利妥昔单抗维持治疗的毒性较低(3-4 级白细胞减少或感染 < 5%),但在接受 R-FC 后接受利妥昔单抗维持治疗的患者中更为明显,这些患者中 3-4 级白细胞减少(高达 40%)和感染(高达 15%)较为常见。
对于 MCL 老年患者,R-CHOP 序贯利妥昔单抗维持治疗直至疾病进展的优异结果在成熟的随访中得以持续。延长利妥昔单抗维持治疗至 2 年以上是有效且安全的。