Suppr超能文献

社区药剂师对抗菌药物管理的知识、认知与实践:一项系统性综述。

Knowledge, Perceptions and Practices of Community Pharmacists Towards Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Systematic Scoping Review.

作者信息

Saha Sajal K, Barton Chris, Promite Shukla, Mazza Danielle

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Monash University, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC 3168, Australia.

National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship (NCAS), The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Dec 12;8(4):263. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040263.

Abstract

The scope of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) surveys on community pharmacists (CPs) is uncertain. This study examines the breadth and quality of AMS survey tools measuring the stewardship knowledge, perceptions and practices (KPP) of CPs and analyse survey outcomes. Following PRISMA-ScR checklist and Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework seven medical databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened the literatures, assessed quality of surveys and KPP outcomes were analysed and described. Ten surveys were identified that assessed CPs' AMS perceptions ( = 7) and practices ( = 8) but none that assessed AMS knowledge. Three survey tools had been formally validated. Most CPs perceived that AMS improved patient care (median 86.0%, IQR, 83.3-93.5%, = 6), and reduced inappropriate antibiotic use (84.0%, IQR, 83-85%, = 2). CPs collaborated with prescribers for infection control (54.7%, IQR 34.8-63.2%, = 4) and for uncertain antibiotic treatment (77.0%, IQR 55.2-77.8%, = 5). CPs educated patients (53.0%, IQR, 43.2-67.4%, = 5) and screened guideline-compliance of antimicrobial prescriptions (47.5%, IQR, 25.2-58.3%, = 3). Guidelines, training, interactions with prescribers, and reimbursement models were major barriers to CP-led AMS implementation. A limited number of validated survey tools are available to assess AMS perceptions and practices of CPs. AMS survey tools require further development to assess stewardship knowledge, stewardship targets, and implementation by CPs.

摘要

针对社区药剂师开展抗菌药物管理(AMS)调查的范围尚不确定。本研究探讨了衡量社区药剂师管理知识、认知和实践(KPP)的AMS调查工具的广度和质量,并分析了调查结果。按照系统评价和Meta分析扩展版(PRISMA-ScR)清单以及阿克西和奥马利的方法框架,检索了七个医学数据库。两名评审员独立筛选文献、评估调查质量,并对KPP结果进行分析和描述。共识别出10项评估社区药剂师AMS认知(n = 7)和实践(n = 8)的调查,但没有一项评估AMS知识。有三种调查工具经过了正式验证。大多数社区药剂师认为,AMS改善了患者护理(中位数86.0%,四分位间距,83.3 - 93.5%,n = 6),并减少了不适当的抗生素使用(84.0%,四分位间距,83 - 85%,n = 2)。社区药剂师与开处方者合作进行感染控制(54.7%,四分位间距34.8 - 63.2%,n = 4)以及处理不确定的抗生素治疗(77.0%,四分位间距55.2 - 77.8%,n = 5)。社区药剂师对患者进行教育(53.0%,四分位间距,43.2 - 67.4%,n = 5),并筛查抗菌药物处方的指南依从性(47.5%,四分位间距,25.2 - 58.3%,n = 3)。指南、培训、与开处方者的互动以及报销模式是社区药剂师主导的AMS实施的主要障碍。可用于评估社区药剂师AMS认知和实践的经过验证的调查工具数量有限。AMS调查工具需要进一步开发,以评估管理知识、管理目标以及社区药剂师的实施情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e4f/6963969/c1daf9f61965/antibiotics-08-00263-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验