Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.
Center for Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 4;9(10):e015620. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015620.
Non-prescription antibiotic dispensing is prevalent among community pharmacies in several low- and middle-income countries. We evaluated the impact of a multi-faceted intervention to address this challenge in urban community pharmacies in Indonesia.
A pre-post quasi-experimental study was carried out in Semarang city from January to August 2022 to evaluate a 7-month long intervention comprising: (1) online educational sessions for pharmacists; (2) awareness campaign targeting customers; (3) peer visits; and (4) pharmacy branding and pharmacist certification. All community pharmacies were invited to take part with consenting pharmacies assigned to the participating group and all remaining pharmacies to the non-participating group. The primary outcome (rate of non-prescription antibiotic dispensing) was measured by standardised patients displaying symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection (UTI) and seeking care for diarrhoea in a child. χ tests and multivariate random-effects logistic regression models were conducted. Thirty in-depth interviews were conducted with pharmacists, staff and owners as well as other relevant stakeholders to understand any persistent barriers to prescription-based dispensing of antibiotics.
Eighty pharmacies participated in the study. Postintervention, non-prescription antibiotics were dispensed in 133/240 (55.4%) consultations in the participating group compared with 469/570 (82.3%) in the non-participating group (p value <0.001). The pre-post difference in the non-prescription antibiotic dispensing rate in the participating group was 20.9% (76.3%-55.4%) compared with 2.3% (84.6%-82.3%) in the non-participating group (p value <0.001).Non-prescription antibiotics were less likely to be dispensed in the participating group (OR=0.19 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.43)) and more likely to be dispensed for the UTI scenario (OR=3.29 (95% CI 1.56 to 6.94)). Barriers to prescription-based antibiotic dispensing included fear of losing customers, customer demand, and no supervising pharmacist present.
Multifaceted interventions targeting community pharmacies can substantially reduce non-prescription antibiotic dispensing. Future studies to evaluate the implementation and sustainability of this intervention on a larger scale are needed.
在一些低收入和中等收入国家,非处方抗生素的配发在社区药店中很普遍。我们评估了一项多方面干预措施在印度尼西亚城市社区药店中解决这一挑战的效果。
2022 年 1 月至 8 月在三宝垄市进行了一项前后准实验研究,以评估为期 7 个月的干预措施,包括:(1)为药剂师提供在线教育课程;(2)针对客户的宣传活动;(3)同行访问;和(4)药店品牌建设和药剂师认证。所有社区药店都被邀请参与,同意参与的药店被分配到参与组,其余所有药店被分配到非参与组。主要结局(非处方抗生素配发率)通过表现出上呼吸道感染、尿路感染(UTI)症状并为儿童腹泻寻求护理的标准患者来衡量。进行了 χ 检验和多变量随机效应逻辑回归模型。对药剂师、员工和所有者以及其他相关利益相关者进行了 30 次深入访谈,以了解任何持续存在的以处方为基础配发抗生素的障碍。
有 80 家药店参与了这项研究。干预后,参与组的 240 次就诊中有 133 次(55.4%)配发了非处方抗生素,而非参与组的 570 次就诊中有 469 次(82.3%)(p 值<0.001)。参与组非处方抗生素配发率的前后差异为 20.9%(76.3%-55.4%),而非参与组为 2.3%(84.6%-82.3%)(p 值<0.001)。参与组不太可能配发非处方抗生素(OR=0.19(95%CI 0.09 至 0.43)),更有可能为 UTI 情况配发(OR=3.29(95%CI 1.56 至 6.94))。以处方为基础配发抗生素的障碍包括担心失去顾客、顾客需求以及没有监督药剂师在场。
针对社区药店的多方面干预措施可以大大减少非处方抗生素的配发。需要进一步开展评估这种干预措施在更大范围内的实施和可持续性的研究。