Landersoe Selma Kloeve, Forman Julie Lyng, Birch Petersen Kathrine, Larsen Elisabeth Clare, Nøhr Bugge, Hvidman Helene Westring, Nielsen Henriette Svarre, Nyboe Andersen Anders
The Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Feb;25(1):65-71. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1702158. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
The aim of the study was to assess whether the ovarian reserve markers anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were lower among women using the progestin-only pill (POP) or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and similar to the decrease observed in combined oral contraceptive (COC) pill users. This retrospective study comprised 565 hormonal contraceptive users (COC, POP, LNG-IUS or contraceptive vaginal ring) and 983 non-hormonal contraceptive users, who were seen in two Danish fertility assessment and counselling clinics between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted multiple regression analysis was used to examine the differences in AMH and AFC between hormonal and non-hormonal contraceptive users. Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AMH was 31.1% lower among COC users [95% confidence interval (CI) -39.6%, -25.9%; < 0.001], 35.6% lower among POP users (95% CI -49.0%, -18.6%; < 0.001) and 17.1% lower among LNG-IUS users (95% CI -31.4%, 0.002%; = 0.052); no significant differences were seen among vaginal ring users. Compared with non-hormonal contraceptive users, AFC was 31.3% lower among COC users (95% CI -35.0%, -25.3%; < 0.001) and 29.7% lower among POP users (-39.1%, -17.9%; < 0.001); no significant differences were seen among LNG-IUS or vaginal ring users. Ovarian volume was more than 50% reduced among COC and vaginal ring users ( < 0.001) but was unchanged among POP and LNG-IUS users. Assessment of ovarian reserve markers among users of all types of hormonal contraception should be interpreted cautiously and the type of contraceptive method considered.
本研究的目的是评估在使用仅含孕激素的避孕药(POP)或左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)的女性中,卵巢储备标志物抗苗勒管激素(AMH)和窦卵泡计数(AFC)是否较低,以及是否与复方口服避孕药(COC)使用者中观察到的下降情况相似。这项回顾性研究纳入了565名激素避孕使用者(COC、POP、LNG-IUS或避孕阴道环)和983名非激素避孕使用者,他们于2015年至2019年期间在丹麦的两家生育评估和咨询诊所就诊。采用校正多元回归分析来检验激素避孕使用者与非激素避孕使用者之间AMH和AFC的差异。与非激素避孕使用者相比,COC使用者的AMH降低了31.1%[95%置信区间(CI)-39.6%,-25.9%;P<0.001],POP使用者降低了35.6%(95%CI -49.0%,-18.6%;P<0.001),LNG-IUS使用者降低了17.1%(95%CI -31.4%,0.002%;P = 0.052);阴道环使用者之间未观察到显著差异。与非激素避孕使用者相比,COC使用者的AFC降低了31.3%(95%CI -35.0%,-25.3%;P<0.001),POP使用者降低了29.7%(-39.1%,-17.9%;P<0.001);LNG-IUS或阴道环使用者之间未观察到显著差异。COC和阴道环使用者的卵巢体积减少了50%以上(P<0.001),但POP和LNG-IUS使用者的卵巢体积未发生变化。对于所有类型激素避孕使用者的卵巢储备标志物评估应谨慎解读,并考虑避孕方法的类型。