Touro University California College of Pharmacy, Vallejo, CA.
Washington State University College of Pharmacy, Spokane, WA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Mar 5;77(6):457-465. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz342.
To gather rich details about the value of technician certification from diverse groups of pharmacists of various practice settings and levels of experience.
Focus groups of pharmacists were conducted using a semistructured interview guide in 4 states (California, Idaho, Tennessee, and Washington) varying in pharmacy technician scope of practice, regulation, and education and/or training environment. Participant pharmacists came from health-system, clinic, and community pharmacy environments. The focus groups took the unique approach of an organizational behavior perspective to contextualize technician readiness for practice change and employer fit. The sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Rapid-based qualitative analysis was used to code the data, with summary templates completed by 2 of the researchers for each of the 4 sessions.
There were a total of 33 focus group participants, including 13 male and 20 female pharmacists ranging in age from 27 to 68 years. The 4 major themes yielded by the data were (1) impact of certification, (2) context of certification, (3) organizational culture considerations, and (4) future credentialing. Certification was deemed to have a greater impact on technician maturation, professional socialization, and career commitment than on actual job skills, even while job knowledge was also deemed to be enhanced. In fact, the certification process was also deemed beneficial in that it meshes with on-the-job training. Participants indicated preferences for technician certification examinations to incorporate more content in "soft skills" and also for development of more specialty and/or differentiated certification products.
Pharmacists from 4 states saw value in certification but agreed that certification is but one component of readying technicians for future practice. Suggestions for furthering the value of certification were shared.
从不同实践环境和经验水平的药剂师群体中收集有关技术员认证价值的丰富细节。
在加利福尼亚州、爱达荷州、田纳西州和华盛顿州这 4 个州进行了药剂师焦点小组讨论,这些州的药房技术员的实践范围、法规以及教育和/或培训环境各不相同。参与焦点小组的药剂师来自于医疗系统、诊所和社区药房环境。这些焦点小组采用组织行为学的独特视角来使技术员为实践变革和雇主适应做好准备。会议进行了录音,并逐字记录。使用基于快速的定性分析对数据进行编码,由两名研究人员为每个小组的 4 个会议分别完成总结模板。
共有 33 名焦点小组参与者,包括 13 名男性和 20 名女性药剂师,年龄从 27 岁到 68 岁不等。数据产生了 4 个主要主题,分别是(1)认证的影响,(2)认证的背景,(3)组织文化的考虑因素,以及(4)未来的认证。认证被认为对技术员的成熟度、职业社会化和职业承诺的影响大于对实际工作技能的影响,尽管工作知识也被认为得到了提高。事实上,认证过程也被认为是有益的,因为它与在职培训相吻合。参与者表示,他们希望技术人员认证考试能在“软技能”方面纳入更多内容,并开发更多专业和/或差异化的认证产品。
来自 4 个州的药剂师认为认证有价值,但他们也认为认证只是使技术员为未来实践做好准备的一个组成部分。与会者还分享了进一步提高认证价值的建议。