Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 15;88(8):657-667. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Standard guidelines recommend selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as first-line antidepressants for adults with major depressive disorder, but success is limited and patients who fail to benefit are often switched to non-selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor agents. This study investigated whether brain- and behavior-based markers of reward processing might be associated with response to bupropion after sertraline nonresponse.
In a two-stage, double-blinded clinical trial, 296 participants were randomized to receive 8 weeks of sertraline or placebo in stage 1. Individuals who responded continued on another 8-week course of the same intervention in stage 2, while sertraline and placebo nonresponders crossed over to bupropion and sertraline, respectively. Data from 241 participants were analyzed. The stage 2 sample comprised 87 patients with major depressive disorder who switched medication and 38 healthy control subjects. A total of 116 participants with major depressive disorder treated with sertraline in stage 1 served as an independent replication sample. The probabilistic reward task and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were administered at baseline.
Greater pretreatment reward sensitivity and higher resting-state functional connectivity between bilateral nucleus accumbens and rostral anterior cingulate cortex were associated with positive response to bupropion but not sertraline. Null findings for sertraline were replicated in the stage 1 sample.
Pretreatment reward sensitivity and frontostriatal connectivity may identify patients likely to benefit from bupropion following selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor failures. Results call for a prospective replication based on these biomarkers to advance clinical care.
标准指南建议将选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂作为成人重度抑郁症的一线抗抑郁药,但疗效有限,且未受益的患者通常会转为非选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂。本研究旨在探究奖赏处理的脑和行为标志物是否与舍曲林治疗无反应后的安非他酮反应相关。
在一项两阶段、双盲临床试验中,296 名参与者随机分配至第一阶段接受 8 周舍曲林或安慰剂治疗。对治疗有反应的个体继续进入第二阶段,接受相同干预措施的另一个 8 周疗程,而舍曲林和安慰剂无反应者分别交叉至安非他酮和舍曲林治疗。对 241 名参与者的数据进行了分析。第二阶段的样本包括 87 名换用药物的重度抑郁症患者和 38 名健康对照者。第一阶段接受舍曲林治疗的 116 名重度抑郁症患者组成了独立的复制样本。在基线时进行了概率性奖赏任务和静息态功能磁共振成像。
治疗前奖赏敏感性较高且双侧伏隔核与额前扣带皮层之间的静息态功能连接性较高与安非他酮的积极反应相关,而与舍曲林无关。在第一阶段的样本中,对舍曲林的阴性结果得到了复制。
治疗前的奖赏敏感性和额纹状体连接性可能有助于识别在选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗失败后可能受益于安非他酮的患者。这些基于生物标志物的结果需要前瞻性复制,以推进临床护理。