From the Department of Infectious Diseases (N.K., L.-M.A., A.Y., M.L., M.G.), Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, and Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine (N.J.A.), University of Gothenburg; Region Västra Götaland (N.K., L.-M.A., A.Y., M.G.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases, Gothenburg; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (N.J.A., K.B., H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal; King's College London (N.J.A.), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health & Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia at South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK; Department of Mathematical Sciences (S.N.), Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (K.B., H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Neurodegenerative Disease (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, London; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Neurology (R.W.P.), University of California San Francisco.
Neurology. 2020 Sep 22;95(12):e1754-e1759. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010111. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
To test the hypothesis that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has an impact on the CNS by measuring plasma biomarkers of CNS injury.
We recruited 47 patients with mild (n = 20), moderate (n = 9), or severe (n = 18) COVID-19 and measured 2 plasma biomarkers of CNS injury by single molecule array, neurofilament light chain protein (NfL; a marker of intra-axonal neuronal injury) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAp; a marker of astrocytic activation/injury), in samples collected at presentation and again in a subset after a mean of 11.4 days. Cross-sectional results were compared with results from 33 age-matched controls derived from an independent cohort.
The patients with severe COVID-19 had higher plasma concentrations of GFAp ( = 0.001) and NfL ( < 0.001) than controls, while GFAp was also increased in patients with moderate disease ( = 0.03). In patients with severe disease, an early peak in plasma GFAp decreased on follow-up ( < 0.01), while NfL showed a sustained increase from first to last follow-up ( < 0.01), perhaps reflecting a sequence of early astrocytic response and more delayed axonal injury.
We show neurochemical evidence of neuronal injury and glial activation in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19. Further studies are needed to clarify the frequency and nature of COVID-19-related CNS damage and its relation to both clinically defined CNS events such as hypoxic and ischemic events and mechanisms more closely linked to systemic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and consequent immune activation, as well as to evaluate the clinical utility of monitoring plasma NfL and GFAp in the management of this group of patients.
通过测量中枢神经系统损伤的血浆生物标志物,检验 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对中枢神经系统有影响的假说。
我们招募了 47 名轻症(n=20)、中度(n=9)或重症(n=18)COVID-19 患者,在入院时和平均 11.4 天后再次采集样本,使用单分子阵列测量了 2 种中枢神经系统损伤的血浆生物标志物,神经丝轻链蛋白(NfL;轴突内神经元损伤的标志物)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAp;星形胶质细胞激活/损伤的标志物)。横断面结果与来自独立队列的 33 名年龄匹配对照者的结果进行了比较。
重症 COVID-19 患者的血浆 GFAp(=0.001)和 NfL(<0.001)浓度高于对照组,而中度疾病患者的 GFAp 也升高(=0.03)。在重症患者中,血浆 GFAp 的早期峰值在随访时降低(<0.01),而 NfL 从首次到最后一次随访均持续升高(<0.01),可能反映了早期星形胶质细胞反应和更延迟的轴突损伤的顺序。
我们在中度和重度 COVID-19 患者中发现了神经元损伤和神经胶质激活的神经化学证据。需要进一步研究来阐明 COVID-19 相关中枢神经系统损伤的频率和性质,以及其与临床定义的中枢神经系统事件(如缺氧和缺血事件)的关系,以及与更密切相关的全身严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 感染和随之而来的免疫激活的关系,并评估监测血浆 NfL 和 GFAp 在管理这群患者中的临床应用。