Department of Epidemiology, Unit of Etiological and Occupational Epidemiology, Regional Health Service Lazio Region, 00147 Rome, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4512. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124512.
Despite the increased attention given to the health impact assessment of air pollution and to the strategies to control it in both scientific literature and concrete interventions, the results of the implementations, especially those involving traffic, have not always been satisfactory and there is still disagreement about the most appropriate interventions and the methods to assess their effectiveness. This state-of-the-art article reviews the recent interpretation of the concepts that concern the impact assessment, and compares old and new measurements of attributable risk and attributable fraction. It also summarizes the ongoing discussion about the designs and methods for assessing the air pollution impact with particular attention to improvements due to spatio-temporal analysis and other new approaches, such as studying short term effects in cohorts, and the still discussed methods of predicting the values of attributable risk (AR). Finally, the study presents the more recent analytic perspectives and the methods for directly assessing the effects of not yet implemented interventions on air quality and health, in accordance with the suggestion in the strategic plan 2020-2025 from the Health Effect Institute.
尽管在科学文献和具体干预措施中,人们越来越关注空气污染对健康的影响评估及其控制策略,但实施的结果,尤其是涉及交通的干预措施,并不总是令人满意,对于最合适的干预措施以及评估其效果的方法仍存在分歧。本文综述了近期对关注的影响评估概念的解释,并比较了归因风险和归因分数的旧测量值和新测量值。本文还总结了目前正在进行的关于评估空气污染影响的设计和方法的讨论,特别关注由于时空分析和其他新方法(如在队列中研究短期影响)而带来的改进,以及仍在讨论的归因风险 (AR) 值预测方法。最后,该研究根据健康影响研究所 2020-2025 年战略计划的建议,提出了更近期的分析观点和方法,以直接评估尚未实施的干预措施对空气质量和健康的影响。