Suppr超能文献

量化并解释美国普查区、县和州各级的预期寿命变化。

Quantifying and explaining variation in life expectancy at census tract, county, and state levels in the United States.

机构信息

Post-Graduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, 88034495 Florianópolis, Brazil.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17688-17694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003719117. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

Abstract

Studies on geographic inequalities in life expectancy in the United States have exclusively focused on single-level analyses of aggregated data at state or county level. This study develops a multilevel perspective to understanding variation in life expectancy by simultaneously modeling the geographic variation at the levels of census tracts (CTs), counties, and states. We analyzed data from 65,662 CTs, nested within 3,020 counties and 48 states (plus District of Columbia). The dependent variable was age-specific life expectancy observed in each of the CTs. We also considered the following CT-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics as independent variables: population density; proportions of population who are black, who are single parents, who are below the federal poverty line, and who are aged 25 or older who have a bachelor's degree or higher; and median household income. Of the total geographic variation in life expectancy at birth, 70.4% of the variation was attributed to CTs, followed by 19.0% for states and 10.7% for counties. The relative importance of CTs was greater for life expectancy at older ages (70.4 to 96.8%). The CT-level independent variables explained 5 to 76.6% of between-state variation, 11.1 to 58.6% of between-county variation, and 0.7 to 44.9% of between-CT variation in life expectancy across different age groups. Our findings indicate that population inequalities in longevity in the United States are primarily a local phenomenon. There is a need for greater precision and targeting of local geographies in public policy discourse aimed at reducing health inequalities in the United States.

摘要

关于美国预期寿命的地理不平等问题的研究仅专注于对州或县一级汇总数据的单水平分析。本研究通过同时对普查区(CT)、县和州三个层次的地理变化进行建模,从多水平角度来理解预期寿命的变化。我们分析了来自 65662 个 CT 的数据,这些 CT 嵌套在 3020 个县和 48 个州(包括哥伦比亚特区)中。因变量是每个 CT 观察到的特定年龄的预期寿命。我们还考虑了以下 CT 层面的社会经济和人口特征作为自变量:人口密度;黑人群体、单亲家庭群体、处于联邦贫困线以下的群体以及年龄在 25 岁及以上拥有学士或更高学历的群体的比例;以及家庭中位数收入。在出生时预期寿命的总地理差异中,70.4%的差异归因于 CT,其次是州占 19.0%,县占 10.7%。对于较老年龄段的预期寿命,CT 的相对重要性更大(70.4%至 96.8%)。CT 层面的自变量解释了 5%至 76.6%的州间差异、11.1%至 58.6%的县间差异和 0.7%至 44.9%的不同年龄组之间 CT 差异的预期寿命。我们的研究结果表明,美国人口长寿的不平等主要是一个地方现象。在旨在减少美国健康不平等的公共政策讨论中,需要更加精确和有针对性地关注当地的地理情况。

相似文献

1
Quantifying and explaining variation in life expectancy at census tract, county, and state levels in the United States.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 28;117(30):17688-17694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003719117. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
2
Inequalities in Life Expectancy Among US Counties, 1980 to 2014: Temporal Trends and Key Drivers.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):1003-1011. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0918.
3
County-Level Contextual Characteristics and Disparities in Life Expectancy.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jan;96(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.043.
6
Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach.
Popul Health Metr. 2018 Jan 26;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0159-3.
8
Narrowing geographic inequality in life expectancy in Brazil: a multilevel analysis between 1991 and 2010.
Public Health. 2020 Mar;180:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
9
Extent and socioeconomic correlates of small area variations in life expectancy in Canada and the United States.
Health Rep. 2024 Aug 21;35(8):3-13. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202400800001-eng.
10
Association of census tract-level incarceration rate and life expectancy in New York State.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Oct;75(10):1019-1022. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-216077. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Local government expenditure centralization and spatial variation in working-age mortality.
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 27;30:101791. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101791. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The Ecology of Economic Distress and Life Expectancy.
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;69:1607295. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607295. eCollection 2024.
3
Where Does the Black-White Life Expectancy Gap Come From? The Deadly Consequences of Residential Segregation.
Popul Dev Rev. 2024 Jun;50(2):403-436. doi: 10.1111/padr.12625. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
A tale of many neighborhoods: Latent profile analysis to derive a national neighborhood typology for the US.
Health Place. 2024 Mar;86:103209. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103209. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
5
The Association Between Census Tract Healthy Food Accessibility and Life Expectancy in the United States.
J Urban Health. 2023 Jun;100(3):572-576. doi: 10.1007/s11524-023-00742-x. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
Structural Factors and Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Travel Times to Acute Care Hospitals in the Rural US South, 2007-2018.
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):922-974. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12655. Epub 2023 May 15.
7
Life Expectancy and Built Environments in the U.S.: A Multilevel Analysis.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4):468-476. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.10.008.
9
Association of Neighborhood Conditions and Resources for Children With Life Expectancy at Birth in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2235912. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35912.
10
Heterogeneity in Disparities in Life Expectancy Across US Metropolitan Areas.
Epidemiology. 2022 Nov 1;33(6):890-899. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001537. Epub 2022 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Reducing socioeconomic inequalities in life expectancy among municipalities: the Brazilian experience.
Int J Public Health. 2019 Jun;64(5):713-720. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01244-x. Epub 2019 May 7.
3
Calculating census tract-based life expectancy in New York state: a generalizable approach.
Popul Health Metr. 2018 Jan 26;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12963-018-0159-3.
5
Association of residential greenness with obesity and physical activity in a US cohort of women.
Environ Res. 2018 Jan;160:372-384. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Does Access to Green Space Impact the Mental Well-being of Children: A Systematic Review.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Nov-Dec;37:3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
8
Inequalities in Life Expectancy Among US Counties, 1980 to 2014: Temporal Trends and Key Drivers.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):1003-1011. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0918.
10
The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1750-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4226.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验