Ebert Alexandria R, Bernstein Laura E, Carney Amy Knepple, Patrick Julie Hicks
Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, 53 Campus Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506-6040 USA.
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, USA.
J Adult Dev. 2020;27(4):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s10804-020-09365-x. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
Relative to younger adults, older adults have demonstrated higher emotional well-being in the face of the threats of COVID-19 (e.g., Bruine de Bruin in J Gerontol 10.1093/geronb/gbaa074, 2020) and other events (Bonanno and Diminich in J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54:378-401, 2013). Thus, we predicted that levels of well-being would show minimal change in the first 4 months of COVID-19, with older adults faring better than younger adults. Adults ( = 325, age = 39.7, SD = 12.3) were surveyed before the pandemic began and at four additional time points throughout the first 4 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States. Participants provided demographic information and completed measures of positive and negative affect. Latent growth curves were used to analyze changes in well-being over time, with age as a covariate. There was a significant linear increase in positive affect. Older age was positively associated with initial levels, but age was not associated with the slope. There was a significant curvilinear pattern in negative affect, with an initial increase, which, although remaining elevated, exhibited slow decreases over time. Age was significantly and negatively associated with initial negative affect, but age did not influence the shape or rate of change over time. We detected changes in both positive affect and negative affect during the first 4 months of COVID-19. The magnitude of these changes suggests that the stress of COVID-19 does not lead to an immediate decrease in well-being. Moreover, although older adults showed higher positive affect and lower negative affect relative to other adults, age differences in the trajectory of change did not emerge. Delayed and long-term effects on well-being and whether those effects are age-invariant should be examined over longer periods of time.
与年轻人相比,老年人在面对新冠疫情的威胁时(例如,布鲁因·德·布鲁因在《老年学杂志》,2020年,第10.1093/geronb/gbaa074期)以及面对其他事件时(博南诺和迪米尼奇在《儿童心理学与精神病学杂志》,2013年,第54卷,第378 - 401页)展现出了更高的情绪幸福感。因此,我们预测在新冠疫情的前4个月里,幸福感水平变化极小,且老年人的情况要优于年轻人。在美国新冠疫情爆发的前4个月里,我们在疫情开始前以及另外四个时间点对325名成年人(平均年龄 = 39.7岁,标准差 = 12.3)进行了调查。参与者提供了人口统计学信息,并完成了积极和消极情绪的测量。使用潜在增长曲线分析幸福感随时间的变化,并将年龄作为协变量。积极情绪有显著的线性增长。年龄较大与初始水平呈正相关,但年龄与斜率无关。消极情绪呈现出显著的曲线模式,最初有所增加,尽管一直处于较高水平,但随着时间推移缓慢下降。年龄与初始消极情绪显著负相关,但年龄并不影响随时间变化的形状或速率。我们在新冠疫情的前4个月里检测到了积极情绪和消极情绪的变化。这些变化的幅度表明,新冠疫情带来的压力并不会导致幸福感立即下降。此外,尽管相对于其他成年人,老年人表现出更高的积极情绪和更低的消极情绪,但在变化轨迹上并未出现年龄差异。幸福感的延迟和长期影响以及这些影响是否不受年龄影响,应该在更长的时间段内进行研究。