Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 大流行时期院外心脏骤停的发生率和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Incidence and outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the COVID-19 era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Calvary Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2020 Dec;157:248-258. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of COVID-19 on pre-hospital and hospital services and hence on the prevalence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) remain unclear. The review aimed to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, process, and outcomes of OHCA.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and pre-print websites was performed. Studies reporting comparative data on OHCA within the same jurisdiction, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Study quality was assessed based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Ten studies reporting data from 35,379 OHCA events were included. There was a 120% increase in OHCA events since the pandemic. Time from OHCA to ambulance arrival was longer during the pandemic (p = 0.036). While mortality (OR = 0.67, 95%-CI 0.49-0.91) and supraglottic airway use (OR = 0.36, 95%-CI 0.27-0.46) was higher during the pandemic, automated external defibrillator use (OR = 1.78 95%-CI 1.06-2.98), return of spontaneous circulation (OR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.18-2.26) and intubation (OR = 1.87, 95%-CI 1.12--3.13) was more common before the pandemic. More patients survived to hospital admission (OR = 1.75, 95%-CI 1.42-2.17) and discharge (OR = 1.65, 95%-CI 1.28-2.12) before the pandemic. Bystander CPR (OR = 1.18, 95%-CI 0.95-1.46), unwitnessed OHCA (OR = 0.84, 95%-CI 0.66-1.07), paramedic-resuscitation attempts (OR = 1.19 95%-CI 1.00-1.42) and mechanical CPR device use (OR = 1.57 95%-CI 0.55-4.55) did not defer significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence and mortality following OHCA was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were significant variations in resuscitation practices during the pandemic. Research to define optimal processes of pre-hospital care during a pandemic is urgently required.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020203371).

摘要

背景

COVID-19 对院前和医院服务的影响,以及由此对院外心脏骤停 (OHCA) 的发生率和结局的影响仍不清楚。本综述旨在评估 COVID-19 大流行对 OHCA 的发生率、救治过程和结局的影响。

方法

对 PubMed、EMBASE 和预印本网站进行系统检索。纳入了在同一司法管辖区内报告 COVID-19 大流行前后 OHCA 比较数据的研究。根据纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。

结果

纳入了 10 项报告了 35379 例 OHCA 事件的数据研究。自大流行以来,OHCA 事件增加了 120%。大流行期间,OHCA 到救护车到达的时间更长(p=0.036)。尽管大流行期间死亡率(OR=0.67,95%CI 0.49-0.91)和使用声门上气道(OR=0.36,95%CI 0.27-0.46)更高,但自动体外除颤器(OR=1.78,95%CI 1.06-2.98)、自主循环恢复(OR=1.63,95%CI 1.18-2.26)和插管(OR=1.87,95%CI 1.12-3.13)的使用更为常见,复苏前院内心脏骤停(OR=1.75,95%CI 1.42-2.17)和出院(OR=1.65,95%CI 1.28-2.12)的存活患者更多。在大流行之前,旁观者心肺复苏术(OR=1.18,95%CI 0.95-1.46)、无人见证的 OHCA(OR=0.84,95%CI 0.66-1.07)、急救人员复苏尝试(OR=1.19,95%CI 1.00-1.42)和机械心肺复苏术设备使用(OR=1.57,95%CI 0.55-4.55)差异无统计学意义。

结论

COVID-19 大流行期间,OHCA 后的发生率和死亡率更高。大流行期间复苏实践存在显著差异。迫切需要研究定义大流行期间院前护理的最佳流程。

审查注册

PROSPERO(CRD42020203371)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b3d/7603976/5f3195f32f56/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验