Mathew Asha, Doorenbos Ardith Z, Li Hongjin, Jang Min Kyeong, Park Chang Gi, Bronas Ulf G
14681College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.
College of Nursing, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Biol Res Nurs. 2021 Jul;23(3):341-361. doi: 10.1177/1099800420969898. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Individuals with cancer experience stress throughout the cancer trajectory. Allostatic load (AL), a cumulative multi-system measure, may have a greater value in stress assessment and the associated biological burden than individual biomarkers. A better understanding of the use of AL and its operationalization in cancer could aid in early detection and prevention or alleviation of AL in this population.
To consolidate findings on the operationalization, antecedents, and outcomes of AL in cancer.
Seven databases (CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, APA PsycInfo, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched for articles published through April 2020. The NIH tools were used to assess study quality.
Twelve studies met inclusion criteria for this review. Although variability existed in the estimation of AL, biomarkers of cardiovascular, metabolic, and immune systems were mostly used. Associations of AL with cancer-specific variables were examined mostly utilizing population-databases. Significant associations of AL with variables such as cancer-related stress, positive cancer history, post traumatic growth, resilience, tumor pathology, and cancer-specific mortality were found. Mini meta-analysis found that a one-unit increase in AL was associated with a 9% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality.
This review reveals heterogeneity in operationalization of AL in cancer research and lack of clarity regarding causal direction between AL and cancer. Nevertheless, AL holds a significant promise in cancer research and practice. AL could be included as a screening tool for high-risk individuals or a health outcome in cancer. Optimal standardized approaches to measure AL would improve its clinical utility.
癌症患者在整个癌症病程中都会经历压力。应激负荷(AL)是一种累积性多系统测量指标,在压力评估及相关生物负担方面可能比单个生物标志物更具价值。更好地理解AL在癌症中的应用及其操作化方法,有助于在这一人群中早期发现和预防或减轻AL。
整合关于AL在癌症中的操作化方法、 antecedents(此处可能有误,推测是“前因”之类意思,但不明确准确含义)及结果的研究发现。
检索了七个数据库(CINAHL、Ovid MEDLINE、科学网、美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库、Scopus、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL)中截至2020年4月发表的文章。使用美国国立卫生研究院的工具评估研究质量。
12项研究符合本综述的纳入标准。尽管在AL的评估方面存在差异,但大多使用了心血管、代谢和免疫系统的生物标志物。AL与癌症特异性变量之间的关联大多利用人群数据库进行了研究。发现AL与癌症相关应激、阳性癌症病史、创伤后成长、心理韧性、肿瘤病理学和癌症特异性死亡率等变量之间存在显著关联。小型荟萃分析发现,AL每增加一个单位,癌症特异性死亡率风险增加9%。
本综述揭示了癌症研究中AL操作化的异质性,以及AL与癌症之间因果方向的不明确性。尽管如此,AL在癌症研究和实践中具有重大前景。AL可作为高危个体的筛查工具或癌症的健康结局指标。测量AL的最佳标准化方法将提高其临床实用性。