College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China; Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Institute of Coastal Environmental Pollution Control, Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China; Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 15;760:143342. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143342. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Using manure compost (MC) as a substitute for chemical fertilizer (CF) has been regarded as an effective strategy to promote sustainable crop production. The application of biochar in compost production could significantly mitigate the emission of gaseous pollutants and improve compost quality. However, comprehensive investigations of the environmental performance of crop production using CF, MC, and biochar-amended MC strategies are scarce. Therefore, in this study, wheat production using four fertilizer strategies, including CF, MC, and biochar-amended MC with biochar addition rates of 5% (MCB5) and 10% (MCB10), was comparatively assessed in terms of their environmental performance using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. Compared to the CF strategy, the majority of midpoint impact categories and all assessed damage categories (except for human health and resources in MCB10) were mitigated using the compost strategies. Furthermore, as the biochar application rate increased, the biochar-amended MC strategies remarkably decreased the impacts on the global warming potential, stratospheric ozone depletion, and land use, and greatly increased the impacts on ozone formation (human health), fine particulate matter formation, and terrestrial acidification. Overall, biochar-amended MC with a biochar addition rate of 5% (MCB5) is recommended as the optimal strategy due to its relatively low environmental impact. Moreover, combined with the results of the sensitivity analysis, biogenic air pollutant emissions derived from the compost and biochar production stages were identified as the most important hotspots contributing to the undesirable environmental impacts. These findings advance our understanding of the environmental performance of wheat production using biochar-amended MC.
利用粪肥堆肥(MC)替代化肥(CF)已被视为促进可持续作物生产的有效策略。在堆肥生产中添加生物炭可以显著减少气态污染物的排放,并改善堆肥质量。然而,关于使用 CF、MC 和添加生物炭的 MC 策略进行作物生产的环境性能的综合研究还很少。因此,在这项研究中,采用生命周期评价(LCA)方法,比较了小麦生产中使用 CF、MC 和添加生物炭的 MC(添加率为 5%(MCB5)和 10%(MCB10))四种肥料策略的环境性能。与 CF 策略相比,堆肥策略显著减轻了大多数中点影响类别和所有评估的损害类别(MCB10 中的人类健康和资源除外)的影响。此外,随着生物炭施用量的增加,添加生物炭的 MC 策略显著降低了全球变暖潜势、平流层臭氧消耗和土地利用的影响,同时大大增加了对臭氧形成(人类健康)、细颗粒物形成和陆地酸化的影响。总体而言,推荐使用添加生物炭的 MC(添加率为 5%(MCB5))作为最优策略,因为其环境影响相对较低。此外,结合敏感性分析的结果,堆肥和生物炭生产阶段产生的生物成因空气污染物排放被确定为对环境影响不利的最重要热点。这些发现提高了我们对使用添加生物炭的 MC 进行小麦生产的环境性能的理解。