School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Optometry and Vision Science, Optometry School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Biofouling. 2020 Oct;36(9):1019-1030. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2020.1843638. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
Melimine and Mel4 are cationic antimicrobial peptides which can resist biofilm development once bound to biomaterials. The aim of the current study was to determine the mode of action of bound melimine and Mel4 against The peptides were covalently attached to glass using an azidobenzoic acid linker. The amount of attached peptides was confirmed by XPS and amino acid analysis and their covalent attachment by SDS extraction. The release of autolysins after interaction of with immobilized peptides was determined in cell free supernatants. The interaction of immobilized peptides with lipoteichoic acid was confirmed by ELISA. Membrane damage by surface bound peptides was assessed using DiSC(3)-5 (membrane potential sensitive), Syto-9 (membrane permeable) and PI (membrane impermeable) dyes with fluorescence microscopy. Release of ATP and nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) was measured in the surrounding fluid. Attachment of the peptides resulted in increased N% for melimine (5.4 ± 1.8%) and for Mel4 (4.8 ± 1.8%). The concentrations of immobilised amino acids were 0.297 nmole for melimine and 0.358 nmole for Mel4. SDS extraction released < 15% of peptides from the glass. The immobilized peptides bound ≥ 4 times more LTA than control surfaces. More autolysins (8 ± 2%; = 0.026) were released from Mel4 than melimine or control surfaces. Membrane depolarization occurred at 15 min and was associated with a reduction in bacterial viability ≥ 37% for both peptides ( < 0.001). Disruption of the membrane potential resulted in loss of ATP from melimine (0.9 ± 0.4 nM) or Mel4 (0.6 ± 0.3 nM) coated surfaces compared to control ( < 0.001). Melimine coatings yielded 27 ± 11% ( = 0.026) and Mel4 gave 17 ± 12% ( = 0.150) PI stained cells after 4 h. DNA/RNA was released only by melimine coatings (2.1 ± 0.1 times; = 0.011) compared to process control at 6 h. Both bound peptides resulted in the release of ATP, but only melimine released DNA/RNA while Mel4-coating resulted in the release of autolysins. Since the mode of action of melimine and Mel4 relate to the cell surface, they have potential for the development of infection-resistant implants.
梅利明和 Mel4 是阳离子抗菌肽,一旦与生物材料结合,就可以抵抗生物膜的形成。本研究的目的是确定结合的梅利明和 Mel4 对肽的作用模式。使用叠氮苯甲酸接头将肽共价连接到玻璃上。通过 XPS 和氨基酸分析确认结合的肽的量,并通过 SDS 提取确认其共价结合。在无细胞上清液中测定与固定化肽相互作用后自溶素的释放。通过 ELISA 确认固定化肽与脂磷壁酸的相互作用。通过荧光显微镜用 DiSC(3)-5(膜电位敏感)、Syto-9(膜可渗透)和 PI(膜不可渗透)染料评估表面结合肽引起的膜损伤。在周围液体中测量 ATP 和核酸(DNA/RNA)的释放。肽的附着导致梅利明(5.4 ± 1.8%)和 Mel4(4.8 ± 1.8%)的 N%增加。固定化氨基酸的浓度为 0.297nmole 用于梅利明和 0.358nmole 用于 Mel4。SDS 提取从玻璃上释放的肽 <15%。固定化肽结合的 LTA 比对照表面多≥4 倍。从 Mel4 释放的自溶素(8 ± 2%;= 0.026)多于梅利明或对照表面。膜去极化发生在 15 分钟,与两种肽的细菌活力降低≥37%相关(<0.001)。膜电位的破坏导致从梅利明(0.9 ± 0.4nM)或 Mel4(0.6 ± 0.3nM)涂层表面损失 ATP,与对照相比(<0.001)。梅利明涂层在 4 小时后产生 27 ± 11%(= 0.026)和 Mel4 产生 17 ± 12%(= 0.150)PI 染色细胞。仅在梅利明涂层(2.1 ± 0.1 倍;= 0.011)中释放 DNA/RNA,而在 6 小时的过程对照中释放。两种结合的肽都导致 ATP 的释放,但只有梅利明释放 DNA/RNA,而 Mel4 涂层导致自溶素的释放。由于梅利明和 Mel4 的作用模式与细胞表面有关,因此它们有可能开发出抗感染的植入物。