Suppr超能文献

全血或血浆:哪种基质最适合基于药代动力学的候选药物选择?

Whole blood or plasma: what is the ideal matrix for pharmacokinetic-driven drug candidate selection?

机构信息

ADME-DMPK, Charles River Laboratories, Ashland, OH 44805, USA.

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Future Med Chem. 2021 Jan;13(2):157-171. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2020-0187. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Abstract

In the present era of drug development, quantification of drug concentrations following pharmacokinetic studies has preferentially been performed using plasma as a matrix rather than whole blood. However, it is critical to realize the difference between measuring drug concentrations in blood versus plasma and the consequences thereof. Pharmacokinetics using plasma data may be misleading if concentrations differ between plasma and red blood cells (RBCs) because of differential binding in blood. In this review, factors modulating the partitioning of drugs into RBCs are discussed and the importance of determining RBC uptake of drugs for drug candidate selection is explored. In summary, the choice of matrix (plasma vs whole blood) is an important consideration to be factored in during drug discovery.

摘要

在当今的药物开发时代,药代动力学研究后的药物浓度定量分析更倾向于使用血浆作为基质,而不是全血。然而,认识到测量血液与血浆中的药物浓度之间的差异及其后果至关重要。如果由于血液中存在差异结合,血浆和红细胞(RBC)之间的药物浓度存在差异,那么使用血浆数据进行药代动力学可能会产生误导。在本文综述中,讨论了调节药物向 RBC 分配的因素,并探讨了确定药物对 RBC 的摄取对于候选药物选择的重要性。总之,在药物发现过程中,基质(血浆与全血)的选择是一个需要考虑的重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验