Kawamura Yusuke, Kobayashi Masahiro, Shindoh Junichi, Kobayashi Yuta, Okubo Satoshi, Tominaga Licht, Kajiwara Akira, Kasuya Kayoko, Iritani Soichi, Fujiyama Shunichiro, Hosaka Tetsuya, Saitoh Satoshi, Sezaki Hitomi, Akuta Norio, Suzuki Fumitaka, Suzuki Yoshiyuki, Ikeda Kenji, Arase Yasuji, Hashimoto Masaji, Kozuka Tokuyo, Kumada Hiromitsu
Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Liver Cancer. 2020 Dec;9(6):756-770. doi: 10.1159/000510299. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of additional treatment, especially lenvatinib-transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) sequential therapy, for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Consecutive 56 patients who underwent lenvatinib treatment were reviewed. Oncological aggressiveness of tumor was estimated using a dynamic CT enhancement pattern classification, and clinical impact of subsequent treatment was investigated through analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), and multivariate analysis of potential confounders for survival after progression during lenvatinib therapy.
Heterogeneous enhancement patterns ( and ), which are reportedly associated with higher oncological aggressiveness of HCC, were associated with better objective response to lenvatinib compared to homogeneous enhancement pattern () (86 and 85% vs. 53% in modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), resulting in similar PFS ( = 0.313). Because of significantly worse PPS, overall survival of tumor was poor compared to or tumors ( = 0.009). However, subgroup of patients who achieved subsequent treatment showed significantly better PPS, regardless of CT enhancement pattern. Multivariate analysis confirmed that use of lenvatinib-TACE sequential treatment after progression during lenvatinib therapy was associated with better PPS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.71; = 0.023), while enhancement pattern was correlated with worse PPS (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.06-8.05; = 0.039).
Oncological aggressiveness of HCC estimated by CT enhancement pattern was predictive of PPS after progression during lenvatinib. Successful subsequent treatment with lenvatinib-TACE sequential therapy may offer survival benefit regardless of CT enhancement pattern of HCC.
本研究旨在评估额外治疗,尤其是乐伐替尼-经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)序贯疗法,对不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效。
回顾了连续56例接受乐伐替尼治疗的患者。使用动态CT增强模式分类评估肿瘤的肿瘤侵袭性,并通过分析无进展生存期(PFS)、进展后生存期(PPS)以及乐伐替尼治疗期间进展后生存的潜在混杂因素的多变量分析来研究后续治疗的临床影响。
据报道,与HCC较高肿瘤侵袭性相关的不均匀增强模式(和),与均匀增强模式()相比,对乐伐替尼的客观反应更好(实体瘤改良反应评估标准中分别为86%和85%对53%),导致PFS相似(P = 0.313)。由于PPS明显更差,肿瘤的总生存期比或肿瘤差(P = 0.009)。然而,接受后续治疗的患者亚组显示出明显更好的PPS,无论CT增强模式如何。多变量分析证实,乐伐替尼治疗期间进展后使用乐伐替尼-TACE序贯治疗与更好的PPS相关(风险比[HR],0.08;95%置信区间,0.01 - 0.71;P = 0.023),而增强模式与更差的PPS相关(HR,2.92;95%置信区间,1.06 - 8.05;P = 0.039)。
通过CT增强模式评估的HCC肿瘤侵袭性可预测乐伐替尼治疗期间进展后的PPS。无论HCC的CT增强模式如何,乐伐替尼-TACE序贯疗法成功的后续治疗可能带来生存益处。