Department of Cancer Center, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jinan Eco-environmental Monitoring Center of Shandong Province, Shandong, China.
Cancer. 2021 Oct 15;127(20):3782-3793. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33677. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
The efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) have not been evaluated.
In this open-label, single-center, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04127396), participants with previously untreated HCC and type I-IV PVTT were randomized 1:1 to receive TACE plus lenvatinib (arm L; orally once daily, 12 mg for body weight ≥60 kg or 8 mg for body weight <60 kg) or TACE plus sorafenib (arm S; 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles). The primary end point was time-to-progression (TTP; time from randomization to disease progression) and secondary end points included objective response rate and toxicity. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.
Between December 30, 2018 and May 31, 2020, 64 patients were randomized (arm L, n = 32; arm S, n = 32); most patients had type I/II PVTT (71.9%), and the median target tumor diameter was 9.8 cm (range, 3.8-21.8). After a median follow-up of 16.1 months, patients in arm L had a higher median TTP (4.7 vs 3.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.95; P = .029) and objective response rate (53.1% vs 25.0%, P = .039) versus arm S. Multivariable analysis showed that TACE plus lenvatinib was significantly associated with higher TTP versus TACE plus sorafenib (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.90; P = .021). Comparable safety profiles were observed in arms L and S.
TACE plus lenvatinib was safe, well tolerated, and had favorable efficacy versus TACE plus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT and large tumor burden.
Hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus has a poor prognosis. In addition, most phase 3 trials of drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma exclude patients with major portal vein invasion, and treatment options for these patients are limited. Transarterial chemoembolization has shown promising efficacy in these patients, especially in combination with systemic treatment or radiotherapy. However, transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib has not been investigated in this setting. This open-label, single-center, randomized trial showed that transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib is safe, well tolerated, and has favorable efficacy versus transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.
经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合仑伐替尼治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)合并门静脉癌栓(PVTT)的疗效和安全性尚未得到评估。
在这项开放标签、单中心、随机试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04127396)中,未经治疗的 HCC 合并 I 型-IV 型 PVTT 的患者按 1:1 随机分为 TACE 联合仑伐替尼(L 组;口服,每日一次,体重≥60kg 者为 12mg,体重<60kg 者为 8mg)或 TACE 联合索拉非尼(S 组;400mg 口服,每日 2 次,28 天为 1 个周期)。主要终点是无进展生存期(TTP;从随机分组到疾病进展的时间),次要终点包括客观缓解率和毒性。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估预后因素。
2018 年 12 月 30 日至 2020 年 5 月 31 日期间,共有 64 例患者随机分组(L 组,n=32;S 组,n=32);大多数患者为 I/II 型 PVTT(71.9%),靶肿瘤直径中位数为 9.8cm(范围 3.8-21.8cm)。中位随访 16.1 个月后,L 组患者的中位 TTP 更高(4.7 个月比 3.1 个月;风险比[HR],0.55;95%CI,0.32-0.95;P=0.029),客观缓解率(53.1%比 25.0%;P=0.039)也更高。多变量分析显示,与 TACE 联合索拉非尼相比,TACE 联合仑伐替尼与更高的 TTP 显著相关(HR,0.50;95%CI,0.28-0.90;P=0.021)。L 组和 S 组的安全性相似。
TACE 联合仑伐替尼治疗 HCC 合并 PVTT 及大肿瘤负荷患者安全、耐受良好,与 TACE 联合索拉非尼相比疗效更优。
医生笔记:HCC 合并 PVTT 预后差。此外,大多数 HCC 的三期临床试验排除了有主要门静脉侵犯的患者,这些患者的治疗选择有限。TACE 在这些患者中显示出良好的疗效,特别是与系统治疗或放疗联合使用时。然而,TACE 联合仑伐替尼在这一领域尚未得到研究。本开放标签、单中心、随机试验表明,TACE 联合仑伐替尼治疗 HCC 合并 PVTT 是安全的,耐受良好,与 TACE 联合索拉非尼相比,疗效更优。