Alamer Ahmad A, Almulhim Abdulaziz S, Alrashed Ahmed A, Abraham Ivo
Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona, 1295 N Martin Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 28;9(2):127. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020127.
The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is controversial for treating COVID-19 patients. We aimed to estimate pooled risks of mortality, disease severity, and hospitalization associated with ACEI/ARB use and stratify them by country and country clusters.
We conducted a search in various databases through 4 July 2020 and then applied random-effects models to estimate pooled risks (OR) across stratifications by country cluster. Clusters were chosen to reflect outbreak times (China followed by Korea/Italy, others subsequently) and mobility restrictions (China and Denmark/France/Spain with stricter lockdowns than the UK/US).
Overall analysis showed no increase in mortality; however, a statistical increase in mortality was seen in the US/UK cluster with OR = 1.28 [95% CI = 1.04; 1.56] and a decrease in China with OR = 0.65 [95% CI = 0.43; 0.96] and France with OR = 0.31 [95% CI = 0.14; 0.69]. Severity and hospitalization were not statistically significant in the analysis; however, several associations were seen in specific countries but not in country clusters.
The country-cluster meta-analysis provided a reasonable explanation for COVID-19 mortality among ACEI/ARB users. The analysis did not explain differences in severity and suggested the involvement of other factors. Hospitalization findings among ACEI/ARB users may be considered informative as they may have been subjected to clinical decisions and hospital-bed availability.
使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗新冠肺炎患者存在争议。我们旨在评估使用ACEI/ARB相关的死亡、疾病严重程度和住院的汇总风险,并按国家和国家集群进行分层。
我们在2020年7月4日前对多个数据库进行了检索,然后应用随机效应模型来估计按国家集群分层的汇总风险(OR)。选择集群以反映疫情爆发时间(中国之后是韩国/意大利,随后是其他国家)和流动限制(中国以及丹麦/法国/西班牙的封锁措施比英国/美国更严格)。
总体分析显示死亡率没有增加;然而,在美国/英国集群中观察到死亡率有统计学意义的增加,OR = 1.28 [95% CI = 1.04; 1.56],在中国OR = 0.65 [95% CI = 0.43; 0.96],在法国OR = 0.31 [95% CI = 0.14; 0.69],死亡率下降。分析中严重程度和住院情况在统计学上不显著;然而,在特定国家观察到了一些关联,但在国家集群中未观察到。
国家集群荟萃分析为ACEI/ARB使用者的新冠肺炎死亡率提供了合理的解释。该分析没有解释严重程度的差异,并表明存在其他因素的影响。ACEI/ARB使用者的住院情况研究结果可能被认为具有参考价值,因为这些结果可能受到临床决策和病床可用性的影响。