Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Tissues, Cells and Advanced Therapeutics, Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK.
Cytotherapy. 2021 Aug;23(8):730-739. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.12.014. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
Cell-based therapies (CBTs) provide opportunities to treat rare and high-burden diseases. Manufacturing development of these innovative products is said to be complex and costly. However, little research is available providing insight into resource use and cost drivers. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the feasibility of estimating the cost of manufacturing development of two cell-based therapy case studies using a CBT cost framework specifically designed for small-scale cell-based therapies.
A retrospective costing study was conducted in which the cost of developing an adoptive immunotherapy of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and a pluripotent stem cell (PSC) master cell bank was estimated. Manufacturing development was defined as products advancing from technology readiness level 3 to 6. The study was conducted in a Scottish facility. Development steps were recreated via developer focus groups. Data were collected from facility administrative and financial records and developer interviews.
Application of the manufacturing cost framework to retrospectively estimate the manufacturing design cost of two case studies in one Scottish facility appeared feasible. Manufacturing development cost was estimated at £1,201,016 for CTLs and £494,456 for PSCs. Most costs were accrued in the facility domain (56% and 51%), followed by personnel (20% and 32%), materials (19% and 15%) and equipment (4% and 2%).
Based on this study, it seems feasible to retrospectively estimate resources consumed in manufacturing development of cell-based therapies. This fosters inclusion of cost in the formulation and dissemination of best practices to facilitate early and sustainable patient access and inform future cost-conscious manufacturing design decisions.
基于细胞的疗法(CBT)为治疗罕见且负担沉重的疾病提供了机会。这些创新产品的制造开发据说复杂且昂贵。然而,几乎没有研究提供有关资源利用和成本驱动因素的见解。因此,本研究旨在评估使用专门为小规模基于细胞的疗法设计的 CBT 成本框架来估算两种基于细胞的治疗案例研究的制造开发成本的可行性。
进行了一项回顾性成本研究,估算了 Epstein-Barr 病毒特异性细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞(CTL)和多能干细胞(PSC)主细胞库的过继免疫疗法的开发成本。制造开发被定义为产品从技术准备水平 3 推进到 6。该研究在苏格兰的一家工厂进行。通过开发者焦点小组再现了开发步骤。数据从工厂的行政和财务记录以及开发者访谈中收集。
在一家苏格兰工厂应用制造成本框架来回顾性估算两项案例研究的制造设计成本似乎是可行的。CTL 的制造开发成本估计为 1,201,016 英镑,PSC 的制造开发成本估计为 494,456 英镑。大多数成本发生在工厂领域(56%和 51%),其次是人员(20%和 32%)、材料(19%和 15%)和设备(4%和 2%)。
基于这项研究,似乎可以回顾性地估计细胞疗法制造开发中消耗的资源。这有助于将成本纳入最佳实践的制定和传播中,以促进早期和可持续的患者获得,并为未来的成本意识制造设计决策提供信息。