Peek Jenny, Hay Karen, Hughes Pauline, Kostellar Adrienne, Kumar Subodh, Bhikoo Zaheerodin, Serginson John, Marshall Henry M
The University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Australia.
QIMR Berghoffer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Apr 14;5(4):e24976. doi: 10.2196/24976.
Although many smoking cessation smartphone apps exist, few have been independently evaluated, particularly in older populations. In 2017, of the 112 commercially available smoking cessation apps in Australia, only 6 were deemed to be of high quality, in that they partially adhered to Australian guidelines. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to modify smoking behavior at a relatively low cost; however, their acceptability in older smokers remains unknown. Rigorous scientific evaluation of apps is thus urgently needed to assist smokers and clinicians alike.
We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility of a large-scale trial to assess the use and acceptability of a high-quality smoking cessation app in older smokers.
Adult inpatient and outpatient smokers with computer and smartphone access were recruited face to face and via telephone interviews from Metropolitan Hospitals in Brisbane, Australia. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention (requested to download the "My QuitBuddy" smoking cessation app on their smartphone) or the control group (provided access to a tailored smoking cessation support webpage [Quit HQ]). The My QuitBuddy app is freely available from app stores and provides personalized evidenced-based smoking cessation support. Quit HQ offers regular email support over 12 weeks. No training or instructions on the use of these e-resources were given to participants. Outcomes at 3 months included recruitment and retention rates, use and acceptability of e-resource (User Version of the Mobile App Rating Scale [uMARS]), changes in quitting motivation (10-point scale), and self-reported smoking abstinence.
We randomized 64 of 231 potentially eligible individuals (27.7%). The mean age of participants was 62 (SD 8). Nicotine dependence was moderate (mean Heaviness of Smoking Index [HSI] 2.8 [SD 1.2]). At 3 months the retention rate was (58/64, 91%). A total of 15 of 31 participants in the intervention arm (48%) used the app at least once, compared with 10 of 33 (30%) in the control arm. uMARS scores for e-resource use and acceptability were statistically similar (P=.29). Motivation to quit was significantly higher in the intervention arm compared with the control arm (median 6 [IQR 4-8] versus 4 [IQR 4-5], respectively, P=.02). According to the intention-to-treat analysis, smoking abstinence was nonsignificantly higher in the intervention group (4/31 [13%], 95% CI 4%-30%, versus 2/33 [6%], 95% CI 1%-20%; P=.42). The estimated number needed to treat was 14.
Internet and mHealth smoking cessation resources appear acceptable to a minority of older smokers. Smokers who engaged with the allocated e-resources rated them equally, and there were trends toward greater uptake, increased motivation, and higher abstinence rates in the app group; however, only the change in motivation reached statistical significance (median score 6 versus 4, respectively, P=.02). This results of this pilot study suggest that apps may improve quit outcomes in older adults who are willing to use them. Further research into user-app interactions should be undertaken to facilitate improvements in app design and consumer engagement. These favorable trends should be explored in larger trials with sufficient statistical power.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000159156; http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376849&isReview=true.
尽管存在许多戒烟的智能手机应用程序,但很少有经过独立评估的,尤其是在老年人群体中。2017年,在澳大利亚112个商业可用的戒烟应用程序中,只有6个被认为质量较高,因为它们部分符合澳大利亚指南。移动健康(mHealth)应用程序有潜力以相对较低的成本改变吸烟行为;然而,它们在老年吸烟者中的可接受性仍然未知。因此,迫切需要对应用程序进行严格的科学评估,以帮助吸烟者和临床医生。
我们进行了一项试点随机对照试验,以评估大规模试验的可行性,该试验旨在评估一款高质量戒烟应用程序在老年吸烟者中的使用情况和可接受性。
从澳大利亚布里斯班的大都会医院通过面对面和电话访谈招募了有计算机和智能手机使用权限的成年住院和门诊吸烟者。参与者按1:1随机分为干预组(要求在其智能手机上下载“My QuitBuddy”戒烟应用程序)或对照组(提供访问定制的戒烟支持网页[戒烟总部])。My QuitBuddy应用程序可从应用商店免费获取,并提供基于证据的个性化戒烟支持。戒烟总部在12周内提供定期电子邮件支持。未向参与者提供关于使用这些电子资源的培训或指导。3个月时的结果包括招募和保留率、电子资源的使用和可接受性(移动应用程序评分量表用户版[uMARS])、戒烟动机的变化(10分制)以及自我报告的戒烟情况。
我们将231名潜在符合条件的个体中的64名(27.7%)进行了随机分组。参与者的平均年龄为62岁(标准差8)。尼古丁依赖程度为中度(平均吸烟强度指数[HSI]2.8[标准差1.2])。3个月时的保留率为(58/64,91%)。干预组31名参与者中有15名(48%)至少使用过一次该应用程序,而对照组33名参与者中有10名(30%)使用过。电子资源使用和可接受性的uMARS评分在统计学上相似(P = 0.29)。干预组的戒烟动机明显高于对照组(中位数分别为6[四分位间距4 - 8]和4[四分位间距4 - 5],P = 0.02)。根据意向性分析,干预组的戒烟率略高于对照组(4/31[13%],95%置信区间4% - 30%,而2/33[6%],95%置信区间1% - 20%;P = 0.42)。估计需要治疗的人数为14。
互联网和移动健康戒烟资源似乎为少数老年吸烟者所接受。使用分配的电子资源的吸烟者对它们的评价相同,并且应用程序组有更大的采用率、更高的动机和更高的戒烟率的趋势;然而,只有动机的变化达到统计学显著性(中位数评分分别为6和4,P = 0.02)。这项试点研究的结果表明,应用程序可能会改善愿意使用它们的老年人的戒烟结果。应进一步研究用户与应用程序的交互,以促进应用程序设计和消费者参与度的改进。这些有利趋势应在具有足够统计效力的更大规模试验中进行探索。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12619000159156;http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376849&isReview=true。