Dudek-Wicher Ruth, Paleczny Justyna, Kowalska-Krochmal Beata, Szymczyk-Ziółkowska Patrycja, Pachura Natalia, Szumny Antoni, Brożyna Malwina
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Silesian Piasts in Wroclaw, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.
Centre for Advanced Manufacturing Technologies, Wrocław University of Technology, 51-504 Wrocław, Poland.
Pathogens. 2021 Apr 23;10(5):515. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10050515.
Biofilms are surface-attached, structured microbial communities displaying higher tolerance to antimicrobial agents in comparison to planktonic cells. An estimated 80% of all infections are thought to be biofilm-related. The drying pipeline of new antibiotics efficient against biofilm-forming pathogens urges the search for alternative routes of treatment. Essential Oils (EOs), extracted from medicinally important plants, are a reservoir of bioactive compounds that may serve as a foothold in investigating novel antibiofilm compounds. The aim of this study was to compare antimicrobial activity of liquid and volatile fractions of tested EOs against biofilm-forming pathogens using different techniques. In this research, we tested five EOs, extracted from L., Roxb., L., L. and Cheel., against planktonic and biofilm forms of five selected reference strains, namely , , , and To obtain cohesive results, we applied four various methodological approaches: to assess the activity of the liquid fraction of EOs, disc diffusion and the microdilution method were applied; to test EOs' volatile fraction, the AntiBioVol assay and modified Antibiofilm Dressing Activity Measurement (A.D.A.M.) were used. The molecular composition and dynamics of antimicrobial substances released from specific EOs was measured using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). The antimicrobial potency of EO's volatile fraction against biofilm formed by tested strains differed from that of the liquid fraction and was related to the molecular weight of volatile compounds. The liquid fraction of CW-EO and volatile fraction of F-EO acted in the strongest manner against biofilm of . The addition of 0.5% Tween 20 to liquid phase, enhanced activity of G-EO against and biofilm. EO activity depended on the microbial species it was applied against and the chosen assessment methodology. While all tested EOs have shown a certain level of antimicrobial and antibiofilm effect, our results indicate that the choice of EO to be applied against a specific biofilm-forming pathogen requires careful consideration with regard to the above-listed aspects. Nevertheless, the results presented in this research contribute to the growing body of evidence indicating the beneficial effects of EOs, which may be applied to fight biofilm-forming pathogens.
生物膜是附着于表面的结构化微生物群落,与浮游细胞相比,其对抗菌剂具有更高的耐受性。据估计,所有感染中约80%被认为与生物膜有关。新型抗生素对形成生物膜的病原体的研发进展缓慢,这促使人们寻找替代治疗途径。从具有药用价值的植物中提取的精油(EOs)是生物活性化合物的宝库,可为研究新型抗生物膜化合物提供切入点。本研究的目的是使用不同技术比较受试精油的液体和挥发性成分对形成生物膜的病原体的抗菌活性。在本研究中,我们测试了从罗勒、迷迭香、薰衣草、薄荷和山鸡椒中提取的五种精油,针对五种选定的参考菌株的浮游和生物膜形式,即金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌、大肠杆菌、白色念珠菌和热带念珠菌。为了获得连贯的结果,我们应用了四种不同的方法:为了评估精油液体成分的活性,采用了纸片扩散法和微量稀释法;为了测试精油的挥发性成分,使用了AntiBioVol测定法和改良的抗生物膜敷料活性测量法(A.D.A.M.)。使用气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)测定了特定精油释放的抗菌物质的分子组成和动态变化。精油挥发性成分对受试菌株形成的生物膜的抗菌效力与液体成分不同,且与挥发性化合物的分子量有关。CW-EO的液体成分和F-EO的挥发性成分对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的作用最强。在液相中添加0.5%吐温20可增强G-EO对大肠杆菌和白色念珠菌生物膜的活性。精油的活性取决于其作用的微生物种类和所选的评估方法。虽然所有受试精油都显示出一定程度的抗菌和抗生物膜作用,但我们的结果表明,针对特定形成生物膜的病原体选择使用的精油需要根据上述方面仔细考虑。然而,本研究的结果为越来越多表明精油有益作用的证据做出了贡献,这些精油可用于对抗形成生物膜的病原体。