Yoo Changhoon, Kim Jwa Hoon, Ryu Min-Hee, Park Sook Ryun, Lee Danbi, Kim Kang Mo, Shim Ju Hyun, Lim Young-Suk, Lee Han Chu, Lee Joycelyn, Tai David, Chan Stephen Lam, Ryoo Baek-Yeol
Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Liver Cancer. 2021 Apr;10(2):107-114. doi: 10.1159/000512781. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Atezolizumab-bevacizumab is the new standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal sequence of therapy after disease progression on atezolizumab-bevacizumab is unclear.
This multinational, multicenter, and retrospective study assessed clinical outcomes of patients with advanced HCC who received subsequent systemic therapy after progression on atezolizumab-bevacizumab between July 2016 and April 2019.
Among 71 patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab, a total of 49 patients who received subsequent systemic therapy were included in this analysis; the median age was 60 years (range, 37-80) and 73.5% were male. All patients were classified as Child-Pugh A and Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer stage C. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), including sorafenib ( = 29), lenvatinib ( = 19), and cabozantinib ( = 1), were used as second-line therapy for all patients. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 6.1 and 63.3%, respectively, in all patients. With a median follow-up duration of 11.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-4.9) and 14.7 months (95% CI 8.1-21.2) in all patients. Median PFS with lenvatinib was significantly longer than that with sorafenib (6.1 vs. 2.5 months; = 0.004), although there was no significant difference in median OS (16.6 vs. 11.2 months; = 0.347). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade and grade 3 occurred in 42 (85.7) and 8 (16.3%) of patients. Common TRAEs included hand-foot syndrome ( = 26, 53.1%), fatigue ( = 14, 28.6%), hypertension ( = 14, 28.6%), and diarrhea ( = 12, 24.5%).
Second-line treatment with MKIs, mostly sorafenib and lenvatinib, showed comparable efficacy and manageable toxicities in patients with advanced HCC after disease progression on atezolizumab-bevacizumab.
阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗是晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)一线治疗的新标准。然而,阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗疾病进展后的最佳治疗顺序尚不清楚。
这项多中心、多国的回顾性研究评估了2016年7月至2019年4月期间在阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗疾病进展后接受后续全身治疗的晚期HCC患者的临床结局。
在71例接受阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗的患者中,共有49例接受后续全身治疗的患者纳入本分析;中位年龄为60岁(范围37 - 80岁),73.5%为男性。所有患者均为Child-Pugh A级和巴塞罗那临床肝癌C期。多激酶抑制剂(MKIs),包括索拉非尼(n = 29)、仑伐替尼(n = 19)和卡博替尼(n = 1),被用作所有患者的二线治疗。所有患者的客观缓解率和疾病控制率分别为6.1%和63.3%。中位随访时间为11.0个月,所有患者的中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为3.4个月(95%置信区间[CI] 1.8 - 4.9)和14.7个月(95% CI 8.1 - 21.2)。仑伐替尼组的中位PFS显著长于索拉非尼组(6.1个月对2.5个月;P = 0.004),尽管中位OS无显著差异(16.6个月对11.2个月;P = 0.347)。任何级别的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)和3级TRAEs分别发生在42例(85.7%)和8例(16.3%)患者中。常见的TRAEs包括手足综合征(n = 26,53.1%)、疲劳(n = 14,28.6%)、高血压(n = 14,28.6%)和腹泻(n = 12,24.5%)。
在阿替利珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗疾病进展后的晚期HCC患者中,使用多激酶抑制剂进行二线治疗,主要是索拉非尼和仑伐替尼,显示出相当的疗效和可管理的毒性。