Clin Lab. 2021 May 1;67(5). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200822.
Colistin is among the last resort antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin is challenging due to its physicochemical properties. Broth microdilution (BMD) is the recommended method for colistin susceptibility testing. However BMD is not practical for clinical microbiology laboratories as manual preparation of BMD plates is time-consuming and labor intensive. Recently, some more user-friendly BMD products with commercial panels have become available. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of a commercial broth microdilution (BMD) product [Sensititre (Thermo Fisher Scientific)] for colistin MIC determination by comparison with reference BMD method using a collection of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates.
A total of 323 unique patient isolates (102 E. coli, 221 K. pneumoniae) were included in the study. Isolates were stored at -70°C and subcultured twice on sheep blood agar before testing. Colistin MICs of the isolates were determined using Sensititre (a premade BMD product with dried antibiotics) and an 'in-house prepared BMD panel prepared in accordance with CLSI guidelines' (reference method). MIC determination with Sensititre was performed according to manufacturer's instructions. The reference method was performed using untreated 96-well sterile polystyrene plates. Colistin MIC results were interpreted according to EUCAST breakpoints (susceptible, ≤ 2 mg/L; resistant, > 2 mg/L).
Overall susceptibility rate of isolates to colistin by reference BMD was 75.9%. Overall categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), very major error (VME), and major error (ME) rates for Sensititre were 98.5%, 72.5%, 3.8%, and 0.8%, respectively. The CA and EA between Sensititre and reference BMD for the isolates with reference colistin MICs close to the susceptibility breakpoint (2 - 8 mg/L) was 94.2% and 48.1%, respectively. Sensititre yielded a VME rate of 15% and ME rate of 0%, respectively, for this subset of isolates.
In conclusion, Sensititre showed high CA but low EA with reference BMD for entire collection of isolates. The VME rate was just slightly above 3% and ME rate was acceptable. The rates of CA and EA were decreased and the rate of VME was increased when a subset consisting of more challenging isolates was used.
多药耐药革兰氏阴性病原体引起的感染的治疗中,粘菌素是最后一道防线抗生素。由于其物理化学性质,粘菌素的药敏试验具有挑战性。肉汤微量稀释法(BMD)是粘菌素药敏试验的推荐方法。然而,BMD 对于临床微生物学实验室来说并不实用,因为手动制备 BMD 平板既耗时又费力。最近,一些更便于用户使用的带有商业试剂盒的 BMD 产品已经问世。我们的目的是通过与参考 BMD 方法比较,评估一种商业肉汤微量稀释(BMD)产品 [Sensititre(赛默飞世尔科技)] 用于粘菌素 MIC 测定的性能,该产品使用了一组大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株。
共纳入 323 个独特的患者分离株(102 株大肠杆菌,221 株肺炎克雷伯菌)进行研究。分离株在 -70°C 下储存,并在测试前在绵羊血琼脂上两次传代。使用 Sensititre(一种带有干燥抗生素的预制备 BMD 产品)和按照 CLSI 指南制备的“内部制备 BMD 试剂盒”(参考方法)确定分离株的粘菌素 MIC。根据制造商的说明进行 Sensititre 的 MIC 测定。参考方法使用未经处理的 96 孔无菌聚苯乙烯板进行。根据 EUCAST 折点(敏感,≤2mg/L;耐药,>2mg/L)解释粘菌素 MIC 结果。
通过参考 BMD,分离株对粘菌素的总体敏感性率为 75.9%。Sensititre 的总体分类一致性(CA)、基本一致性(EA)、重大误差(VME)和主要误差(ME)率分别为 98.5%、72.5%、3.8%和 0.8%。对于接近药敏折点(2-8mg/L)的参考粘菌素 MIC 的分离株,Sensititre 与参考 BMD 的 CA 和 EA 分别为 94.2%和 48.1%。Sensititre 对该分离株子集的 VME 率为 15%,ME 率为 0%。
总之,Sensititre 对整个分离株集显示出高 CA 但低 EA 与参考 BMD。VME 率略高于 3%,ME 率可接受。当使用更具挑战性的分离株子集时,CA 和 EA 的比率降低,VME 的比率增加。