Suppr超能文献

美国肺癌筛查中的种族和社会经济差异:系统评价。

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Populations Sciences, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.

Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.

出版信息

CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):299-314. doi: 10.3322/caac.21671. Epub 2021 May 20.

Abstract

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces NSCLC mortality; however, a lack of diversity in LCS studies may limit the generalizability of the results to marginalized groups who face higher risk for and worse outcomes from NSCLC. Identifying sources of inequity in the LCS pipeline is essential to reduce disparities in NSCLC outcomes. The authors searched 3 major databases for studies published from January 1, 2010 to February 27, 2020 that met the following criteria: 1) included screenees between ages 45 and 80 years who were current or former smokers, 2) written in English, 3) conducted in the United States, and 4) discussed socioeconomic and race-based LCS outcomes. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Of 3721 studies screened, 21 were eligible. Eligible studies were evaluated, and their findings were categorized into 3 themes related to LCS disparities faced by Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals: 1) eligibility; 2) utilization, perception, and utility; and 3) postscreening behavior and care. Disparities in LCS exist along racial and socioeconomic lines. There are several steps along the LCS pipeline in which Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals miss the potential benefits of LCS, resulting in increased mortality. This study identified potential sources of inequity that require further investigation. The authors recommend the implementation of prospective trials that evaluate eligibility criteria for underserved groups and the creation of interventions focused on improving utilization and follow-up care to decrease LCS disparities.

摘要

非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是癌症死亡的主要原因。肺癌筛查(LCS)可降低 NSCLC 的死亡率;然而,LCS 研究缺乏多样性可能会限制结果在面临更高风险和更差 NSCLC 结果的边缘化群体中的普遍性。确定 LCS 管道中的不平等来源对于减少 NSCLC 结果的差异至关重要。作者在 3 个主要数据库中搜索了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 27 日发表的符合以下标准的研究:1)纳入年龄在 45 至 80 岁之间的筛查对象,为当前或既往吸烟者,2)用英语书写,3)在美国进行,4)讨论社会经济和种族 LCS 结果。合格的研究进行了偏倚风险评估。在筛选出的 3721 项研究中,有 21 项符合条件。对合格的研究进行了评估,并将其发现分为 3 个主题,涉及黑人面临的 LCS 差异和社会经济劣势个体:1)资格;2)利用、认知和效用;3)筛查后行为和护理。LCS 存在于种族和社会经济的差异。在 LCS 管道中,有几个步骤黑人以及社会经济劣势个体错过了 LCS 的潜在益处,导致死亡率增加。本研究确定了需要进一步调查的不平等潜在来源。作者建议实施前瞻性试验,评估弱势群体的资格标准,并创建干预措施,重点提高利用率和后续护理,以减少 LCS 差异。

相似文献

1
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):299-314. doi: 10.3322/caac.21671. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Investigation.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
4
Racial Differences in Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.2172. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
6
Evidence of Racial Disparities in the Lung Cancer Screening Process: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3731-3738. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07613-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
7
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Among Veterans, 2013 to 2021.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2318795. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18795.
8
Revisiting the lung cancer screening eligibility criteria to promote equity for Black individuals.
Lung Cancer. 2024 May;191:107539. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107539. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.
Radiology. 2021 Dec;301(3):712-720. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204691. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

3
"I'm learning to live after cancer and its treatment": Exploring the challenges of cancer survivorship in Arkansas.
SSM Qual Res Health. 2025 Jun;7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100519. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Multi-level factors associated with low dose computed tomography lung cancer screening in the United States.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2025 Aug;117(4):225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.002. Epub 2025 May 29.
5
Stage at Diagnosis for Common Cancers according to Rurality, Area Deprivation, and Insurance, 2017 to 2021.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Aug 1;18(8):465-474. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0587.
6
Equity and Opportunities in Lung Cancer Care-Addressing Disparities, Challenges, and Pathways Forward.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;17(8):1347. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081347.
7
Attitudes regarding polygenic risk testing for lung cancer: a mixed-methods study.
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf020.
9
Characteristics of the Newly Eligible Population under Two Recent Updates of Lung Cancer Screening Recommendations.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Jun 2;18(6):365-373. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0465.

本文引用的文献

1
Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):78-92. doi: 10.3322/caac.21638. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
3
Evaluating Potential Racial Inequities in Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;112(2):209-214. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.10.002. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
4
Disparities of National Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines in the US Population.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1136-1142. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa013.
5
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):503-513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
6
Age, Race, and Income Are Associated With Lower Screening Rates at a Safety Net Hospital.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 May;109(5):1544-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.052. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Lung Cancer Screening Uptake in the United States.
Chest. 2020 Jan;157(1):236-238. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.08.2176.
8
Racial Disparities in Resection of Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Variability Among Surgeons.
Med Care. 2020 Apr;58(4):392-398. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001280.
9
Disparities in Follow-Up After Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(4):1058-1063. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Sex disparities in lung cancer incidence: validation of a long-observed trend.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Aug;8(4):543-545. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.04.06.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验