Suppr超能文献

种族差异在肺癌筛查过程中的证据:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Evidence of Racial Disparities in the Lung Cancer Screening Process: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3731-3738. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07613-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography for high-risk individuals reduces lung cancer mortality, with greater reduction observed in Black participants in clinical trials. While racial disparities in lung cancer mortality exist, less is known about disparities in LCS participation. We conducted a systematic review to explore LCS participation in Black compared with White patients in the USA.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted through a search of published studies in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied-Health Literature Database, from database inception through October 2020. We included studies that examined rates of LCS participation and compared rates by race. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We screened 18,300 titles/abstracts; 229 studies were selected for full-text review, of which nine studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were categorized into 2 groups: studies that reported the screening rate among an LCS-eligible patient population, and studies that reported the screening rate among a patient population referred for LCS. Median LCS participation rates were 14.4% (range 1.7 to 62.6%) for eligible patient studies and 68.5% (range 62.6 to 88.8%) for referred patient studies. The meta-analyses showed screening rates were lower in the Black compared to White population among the LCS-eligible patient studies ([OR]=0.43, [95% CI: 0.25, 0.74]). However, screening rates were the same between Black and White patients in the referred patient studies (OR=0.94, [95% CI: 0.74, 1.19]).

DISCUSSION

Black LCS-eligible patients are being screened at a lower rate than White patients but have similar rates of participation once referred. Differences in referrals by providers may contribute to the racial disparity in LCS participation. More studies are needed to identify barriers to LCS referral and develop interventions to increase provider awareness of the importance of LCS in Black patients. Trial Registry PROSPERO; No.: CRD42020214213; URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO.

摘要

背景

低剂量胸部计算机断层扫描对高危人群进行年度肺癌筛查(LCS)可降低肺癌死亡率,临床试验中黑人参与者的降幅更大。虽然肺癌死亡率存在种族差异,但关于 LCS 参与率的差异知之甚少。我们进行了一项系统评价,以探讨与美国白人患者相比,黑人患者接受 LCS 的情况。

方法

通过检索 MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied-Health Literature Database 中的已发表研究,进行了系统评价,检索时间从数据库建立到 2020 年 10 月。我们纳入了研究 LCS 参与率并按种族进行比较的研究。使用随机效应荟萃分析对研究进行汇总。

结果

我们筛选了 18300 篇标题/摘要;对 229 篇全文进行了审查,其中 9 项研究符合纳入标准。研究分为两组:报告 LCS 合格患者人群筛查率的研究,以及报告接受 LCS 转诊患者人群筛查率的研究。合格患者研究中 LCS 参与率中位数为 14.4%(范围 1.7%至 62.6%),而接受 LCS 转诊患者研究中 LCS 参与率中位数为 68.5%(范围 62.6%至 88.8%)。荟萃分析显示,在 LCS 合格患者研究中,黑人患者的筛查率低于白人患者[比值比(OR)=0.43,95%置信区间(CI):0.25,0.74]。然而,在接受 LCS 转诊的患者研究中,黑人患者和白人患者的筛查率相同(OR=0.94,95%CI:0.74,1.19)。

讨论

LCS 合格的黑人患者的筛查率低于白人患者,但在接受转诊后,其参与率相同。提供者转诊的差异可能导致 LCS 参与率的种族差异。需要进一步研究确定 LCS 转诊的障碍,并制定干预措施,以提高提供者对黑人患者进行 LCS 的重要性的认识。

试验注册 PROSPERO;编号:CRD42020214213;网址:http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO。

相似文献

1
Evidence of Racial Disparities in the Lung Cancer Screening Process: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3731-3738. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07613-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Racial Differences in Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.2172. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Among Veterans, 2013 to 2021.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2318795. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18795.
6
Patient Adherence to Screening for Lung Cancer in the US: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2025102. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25102.
7
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Investigation.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
9
Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1561-1569. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1253OC.
10
Lung Cancer Screening by Race and Ethnicity in an Integrated Health System in Hawaii.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44381.

引用本文的文献

3
Novel Platforms of Education to Engage Black and African Americans in Lung Cancer Screening.
AJPM Focus. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):100350. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100350. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Black US military veterans respond favourably to a booklet using narratives to normalise shared decision-making.
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Mar 23;9:100606. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100606. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Lung Cancer Screening: Early Detection Decreases Mortality.
Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):22-24. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.07. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Understanding determinants of lung cancer preventive care in at-risk urban American Indians and Alaska Natives: A mixed-methods study.
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jul 14;45:102822. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102822. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary Residential Segregation and Cancer Disparities.
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;39(25):2739-2741. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01328. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
The Impact of Residential Racial Segregation on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1291-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.04.096. Epub 2021 May 23.
3
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jul;71(4):299-314. doi: 10.3322/caac.21671. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
6
Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States.
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(2):315-332. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01038-6. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Predictors of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization in a Population-Based Survey.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Dec;17(12):1591-1601. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Population.
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):2200-2210. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.592. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验