Department of Virology, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, WHO Collaborating Center for Arbovirus and Hemorrhagic Fever Reference and Research, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Center for Internal Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
J Med Virol. 2021 Oct;93(10):5816-5824. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27113. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
Serological testing for anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies is used to detect ongoing or past SARS-CoV-2 infections. To study the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and to assess the diagnostic performances of eight serological assays, we used 129 serum samples collected on known days post symptom onset (dpso) from 42 patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 54 serum samples from healthy blood donors, and children infected with seasonal coronaviruses. The sera were analyzed for the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG), immunoglobulin M (IgM), and immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence testing (IIFT) based on SARS-CoV-2-infected cells. They were further tested for antibodies against the S1 domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (IgG, IgA) and against the viral nucleocapsid protein (IgG, IgM) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The assay specificities were 94.4%-100%. The sensitivities varied largely between assays, reflecting their respective purposes. The sensitivities of IgA and IgM assays were the highest between 11 and 20 dpso, whereas the sensitivities of IgG assays peaked between 20 and 60 dpso. IIFT showed the highest sensitivities due to the use of the whole SARS-CoV-2 as substrate and provided information on whether or not the individual has been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays provided further information about both the prevalence and concentration of specific antibodies against selected antigens of SARS-CoV-2.
血清学检测抗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体用于检测正在进行或过去的 SARS-CoV-2 感染。为了研究抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的动力学,并评估 8 种血清学检测方法的诊断性能,我们使用了 129 份血清样本,这些样本来自 42 名经聚合酶链反应确诊的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者,采集时间为症状出现后已知天数(dpso),以及 54 份来自健康献血者和感染季节性冠状病毒的儿童的血清样本。使用基于 SARS-CoV-2 感染细胞的间接免疫荧光检测(IIFT)分析血清中 IgG、IgM 和 IgA 抗体的存在。进一步使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 S1 结构域的 IgG、IgA 抗体和针对病毒核衣壳蛋白的 IgG、IgM 抗体。各检测方法的特异性为 94.4%-100%。由于使用了整个 SARS-CoV-2 作为底物,IIFT 的灵敏度最高,因为检测方法的特异性不同,所以灵敏度差异很大,为检测个体是否感染过 SARS-CoV-2 提供了信息。ELISA 提供了有关针对 SARS-CoV-2 选定抗原的特异性抗体的流行率和浓度的进一步信息。