Business School, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland.
Ehrenberg-Bass Institute, University of South Australia, 70 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Waste Manag. 2021 Jul 15;131:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.034. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
Plastic packaging exemplifies recycling's potential; 95 percent of plastic's material use vanishes after a short first-use cycle. Yet over half of plastic packaging could be recycled effectively, economically, and in an environmentally sound manner, with individuals and households playing a focal role in raising recycling rates. This paper draws on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to identify and examine household plastic sorting and recycling factors in Finland's new recycling scheme. The results of a regression analysis generally support existing research, except paradoxically, the easier it was to obtain recycling information the less people recycled. TPB's attitude (environmental concerns) and perceived behavioural control factors (low behavioural costs, and dealing with waste) showed significant positive relationships with Finnish recycling behaviour; the subjective norm (social norms) had an insignificant relationship. Age, living quarters, the time spent recycling, the distance to collection points, and the willingness to improve also related significantly to diligent plastic waste sorting. In addition to re-examining the information type and delivery, the significant role of costs and facilitating conditions offer intervention possibilities to support households to recycle more plastic packaging.
塑料包装是回收利用潜力的典范;在首次使用周期后,95%的塑料材料使用量消失。然而,超过一半的塑料包装可以有效地、经济地和以环境友好的方式进行回收,个人和家庭在提高回收率方面发挥着核心作用。本文借鉴计划行为理论(TPB),在芬兰新的回收计划中确定和检验家庭塑料分类和回收因素。回归分析的结果普遍支持现有研究,除了一个悖论,即获得回收信息越容易,人们的回收量就越少。TPB 的态度(环境问题)和感知行为控制因素(低行为成本和处理废物)与芬兰的回收行为呈显著正相关;主观规范(社会规范)没有显著关系。年龄、居住地点、回收时间、收集点的距离以及改善的意愿也与勤勉的塑料废物分类显著相关。除了重新检查信息类型和传递方式外,成本和促进条件的显著作用为支持家庭回收更多塑料包装提供了干预的可能性。