Shaw Rajib, Kim Yong-Kyun, Hua Jinling
Keio University, Japan.
Ministry of Interior and Safety, Republic of Korea.
Prog Disaster Sci. 2020 Apr;6:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Corona Virus (CODID-19) was first reported in Wuhan in December 2019, then spread in different parts of China, and gradually became a global pandemic in March 2020. While the death toll is still increasing, the epicenter of casualty has shifted from Asia to Europe, and that of the affected people has shifted to USA. This paper analyzes the responses in East Asian countries, in China, Japan and South Korea, and provides some commonalities and lessons. While countries have different governance mechanism, it was found that a few governance decisions in respective countries made a difference, along with strong community solidarity and community behavior. Extensive use of emerging technologies is made along with medical/health care treatment to make the response more effective and reduce the risk of the spread of the disease. Although the pandemic was a global one, its responses were local, depending on the local governance, socio-economic and cultural context.
冠状病毒(COVID-19)于2019年12月首次在武汉被报告,随后在中国不同地区传播,并于2020年3月逐渐成为全球大流行疾病。虽然死亡人数仍在增加,但伤亡中心已从亚洲转移到欧洲,受影响人群的中心已转移到美国。本文分析了东亚国家(中国、日本和韩国)的应对措施,并提供了一些共性和经验教训。虽然各国的治理机制不同,但研究发现,各国的一些治理决策以及强大的社区团结和社区行为起到了作用。在医疗/卫生保健治疗的同时广泛使用新兴技术,以使应对措施更有效,并降低疾病传播风险。尽管疫情是全球性的,但其应对措施是本地化的,取决于当地的治理、社会经济和文化背景。