Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Hartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Center for Molecular Medicine and Oncode Institute, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2022 Sep;84:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
Precision diagnostics is one of the two pillars of precision medicine. Sequencing efforts in the past decade have firmly established cancer as a primarily genetically driven disease. This concept is supported by therapeutic successes aimed at particular pathways that are perturbed by specific driver mutations in protein-coding domains and reflected in three recent FDA tissue agnostic cancer drug approvals. In addition, there is increasing evidence from studies that interrogate the entire genome by whole-genome sequencing that acquired global and complex genomic aberrations including those in non-coding regions of the genome might also reflect clinical outcome. After addressing technical, logistical, financial and ethical challenges, national initiatives now aim to introduce clinical whole-genome sequencing into real-world diagnostics as a rational and potentially cost-effective tool for response prediction in cancer and to identify patients who would benefit most from 'expensive' targeted therapies and recruitment into clinical trials. However, so far, this has not been accompanied by a systematic and prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of whole-genome sequencing within clinical trials of uniformly treated patients of defined clinical outcome. This approach would also greatly facilitate novel predictive biomarker discovery and validation, ultimately reducing size and duration of clinical trials and cost of drug development. This manuscript is the third in a series of three to review and critically appraise the potential and challenges of clinical whole-genome sequencing in solid tumors and hematological malignancies.
精准诊断是精准医学的两大支柱之一。过去十年的测序工作已经明确将癌症确定为主要由遗传驱动的疾病。这一概念得到了治疗成功的支持,这些成功的治疗方法针对特定的途径,这些途径受到蛋白质编码结构域中特定驱动突变的干扰,并反映在最近三种获得美国食品和药物管理局组织学不可知癌症药物批准的治疗方法中。此外,越来越多的研究证据表明,通过全基因组测序来检测整个基因组,获得的包括基因组非编码区域在内的获得性全基因组和复杂基因组异常,也可能反映临床结果。在解决了技术、后勤、财务和伦理方面的挑战之后,国家倡议现在的目标是将临床全基因组测序作为一种合理且具有潜在成本效益的工具,引入现实世界的诊断中,用于预测癌症的反应,并确定最受益于“昂贵”靶向治疗的患者,并将其招募到临床试验中。然而,到目前为止,这并没有伴随着对全基因组测序在统一治疗的明确临床结局的患者的临床试验中的临床实用性进行系统和前瞻性的评估。这种方法还将极大地促进新的预测性生物标志物的发现和验证,最终减少临床试验的规模和持续时间,并降低药物开发的成本。本文是三篇综述中的第三篇,旨在批判性地评价全基因组测序在实体瘤和血液恶性肿瘤中的潜在应用和挑战。