Associate Professor at Fundação Getúlio Vargas Law School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Master in law and development candidate at Fundação Getúlio Vargas Law School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):163-174.
Mandatory vaccination for COVID-19 has been the object of heated debate in Brazil. This article discusses the legality and constitutionality of such a policy. First, it analyzes the laws, regulations, and Supreme Court decisions that provide for the possibility of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. Subsequently, it analyzes the constitutionality of a mandatory vaccination policy through the proportionality method to address the conflict between, on one side, the right to individual autonomy, which includes the right to refuse a medical intervention, and, on the other, health policies that interfere with individual autonomy to protect the rights to life and health. The application of this method allows for the identification of key questions that need to be answered to determine the constitutionality of a mandatory vaccination program. These questions cannot be answered and in the abstract because they depend on the concrete circumstances of the pandemic, on the characteristics of the vaccine(s) against COVID-19, and on how a mandatory vaccination policy might be designed and implemented by authorities.
在巴西,COVID-19 疫苗接种的强制性问题一直是激烈争论的对象。本文讨论了这一政策的合法性和合宪性。首先,分析了法律、法规和最高法院的决定,这些决定为 COVID-19 疫苗接种的强制性提供了可能性。随后,通过比例方法分析了强制接种政策的合宪性,以解决个人自主权权利(包括拒绝医疗干预的权利)与以保护生命和健康权利为目的干预个人自主权的卫生政策之间的冲突。该方法的应用可以确定需要回答的关键问题,以确定强制接种计划的合宪性。这些问题不能一概而论地回答,因为它们取决于大流行的具体情况、COVID-19 疫苗的特性以及当局如何设计和实施强制接种政策。