Mohan Viswanathan, Zargar Abdul, Chawla Manoj, Joshi Ameya, Ayyagari Usha, Sethi Bipin, Gaurav Kumar, Patted Usha Rani H, Bhagat Seema Vikas, Mane Amey Ishwara
Department of Diabetes, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Diabetes and Endocrine Care, Centre for Diabetes and Endocrine Care, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Jun 29;14:2925-2933. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S315227. eCollection 2021.
Early use of combination therapy in diabetes patients may lead to sustained glycemic control and thereby reduce the progression of diabetic complications. Given the limitation of the traditional stepwise intensification strategy, early combination therapy can be an effective approach. Therefore, this study aims to assess the real-world efficacy of a combination of metformin and vildagliptin in comparison to metformin alone in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in India.
This was an observational, retrospective, non-interventional study based on electronic medical records (EMRs) of 2740 T2DM patients, retrieved from 2010 onwards from 22 diabetes centres across India. Adult drug naïve patients with a 5-year history of T2DM treated with either metformin or a combination of metformin and vildagliptin for at least 3 months were considered for this study. Efficacy assessment was done to evaluate the post-treatment HbA1c levels and patients requiring additional oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) at the time of follow-up visit. Patients were also analyzed for the occurrence of adverse events.
Out of the total, 2452 patients were in metformin only arm, and 288 patients were in metformin plus vildagliptin treatment arm. A more significant reduction in HbA1c level was observed in metformin plus vildagliptin arm than metformin only arm (median: -0.5% vs 0%, respectively; <0.001). Patients requiring additional OAD at follow-up were significantly lesser in the metformin plus vildagliptin arm than the metformin only arm (15.6% vs 35.2%, respectively; <0.001). The adverse events were comparable across the two arms, and commonly reported adverse events were giddiness, fatigue and gastric discomfort.
The findings of this EMR-based real-world study emphasizes the need for early initiation of combination therapy (metformin plus vildagliptin) over metformin monotherapy for achieving better glycemic control.
糖尿病患者早期使用联合治疗可能会实现持续的血糖控制,从而减少糖尿病并发症的进展。鉴于传统逐步强化策略的局限性,早期联合治疗可能是一种有效的方法。因此,本研究旨在评估在印度2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,二甲双胍与维格列汀联合使用相较于单独使用二甲双胍的真实疗效。
这是一项基于电子病历(EMR)的观察性、回顾性、非干预性研究,研究对象为2740例T2DM患者,数据从2010年起取自印度22个糖尿病中心。本研究纳入了初治的成年患者,他们患有T2DM且病程达5年,接受二甲双胍治疗或二甲双胍与维格列汀联合治疗至少3个月。进行疗效评估以评价治疗后糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平以及随访时需要加用其他口服降糖药(OAD)的患者情况。还对患者的不良事件发生情况进行了分析。
总共有2452例患者在仅使用二甲双胍组,288例患者在二甲双胍加维格列汀治疗组。与仅使用二甲双胍组相比,二甲双胍加维格列汀组的HbA1c水平降低更为显著(中位数分别为-0.5%和0%;<0.001)。随访时需要加用其他OAD的患者在二甲双胍加维格列汀组显著少于仅使用二甲双胍组(分别为15.6%和35.2%;<0.001)。两组的不良事件发生率相当,常见的不良事件有头晕、乏力和胃部不适。
这项基于电子病历的真实世界研究结果强调,相较于二甲双胍单药治疗,早期启动联合治疗(二甲双胍加维格列汀)对于实现更好的血糖控制很有必要。