Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):3601-3611. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07264-z. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Urban-rural differences in IBD-specific health care utilization at the national level have not been examined in the USA.
We compared urban and rural rates of IBD-related office visits and IBD-specific (Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC)) hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits.
From multiple national data sources, we compared national rates using Z test and compared estimates of patient and hospital characteristics and hospitalization outcomes between urban and rural areas using Chi-square and t tests.
In 2015 and 2016, digestive disease-related office visit rates, per 100 adults, were 3.1 times higher in urban than in rural areas (8.7 vs 2.8, P < 0.001). In 2017, age-adjusted rates per 100,000 adults were significantly higher in rural than urban areas for CD-specific hospitalizations (26.3 vs 23.6, P = 0.03) and ED visits (49.3 vs 39.5, P = 0.002). Compared with their urban counterparts, rural adults hospitalized for CD or UC in 2017 were more likely to be older and non-Hispanic white, have lower household income, Medicare coverage, and an elective admission, and were discharged from hospitals that were large, non-federal government owned, and in the Midwest or South. There were no significant urban-rural differences in length of stay and 30-day readmission rate.
While IBD or digestive disease-related office visit rates were lower in rural compared to urban areas, CD-specific hospitalization and ED visit rates were higher. Strategies that improve office-based care among rural patients with IBD may help to avoid more costly forms of health care use.
在美国,尚未对全国范围内的 IBD 特定医疗保健利用的城乡差异进行研究。
我们比较了城乡地区 IBD 相关门诊就诊率以及 IBD 特异性(克罗恩病(CD)或溃疡性结肠炎(UC))住院率和急诊部(ED)就诊率。
我们从多个国家数据来源中比较了全国数据,使用 Z 检验比较了城乡地区的全国率,使用卡方检验和 t 检验比较了城乡地区患者和医院特征以及住院结局的估计值。
2015 年和 2016 年,城市地区的消化疾病相关门诊就诊率(每 100 名成年人)是农村地区的 3.1 倍(8.7 比 2.8,P<0.001)。2017 年,农村地区每 10 万成年人中,CD 特异性住院率(26.3 比 23.6,P=0.03)和 ED 就诊率(49.3 比 39.5,P=0.002)均显著高于城市地区。与城市相比,2017 年因 CD 或 UC 住院的农村成年人更可能年龄较大,为非西班牙裔白人,家庭收入较低,医疗保险覆盖率较低,选择择期入院,且从大型,非联邦政府拥有,位于中西部或南部的医院出院。农村和城市之间在住院时间和 30 天再入院率方面没有显著差异。
虽然农村地区的 IBD 或消化疾病相关门诊就诊率低于城市地区,但 CD 特异性住院率和 ED 就诊率较高。改善农村地区 IBD 患者的门诊治疗策略可能有助于避免更多昂贵的医疗保健利用。