Suppr超能文献

绝经前早期乳腺癌患者化疗中药物性卵巢抑制的长期结局。

Long-Term Outcomes With Pharmacological Ovarian Suppression During Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Early Breast Cancer Patients.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.

Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Mar 8;114(3):400-408. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab213.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is an established strategy to protect ovarian function in premenopausal breast cancer patients, no long-term safety data are available, raising some concerns in women with hormone receptor-positive disease. There are controversial data on its fertility preservation potential.

METHODS

The Prevention of Menopause Induced by Chemotherapy: a Study in Early Breast Cancer Patients-Gruppo Italiano Mammella 6 (PROMISE-GIM6) trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III superiority trial conducted at 16 Italian centers from October 2003 to January 2008. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control arm) or combined with the GnRHa triptorelin (GnRHa arm). The primary planned endpoint was incidence of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency. Post hoc endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and post-treatment pregnancies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 281 randomly assigned patients, 80.4% had hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (interquartile range = 11.3-13.2 years). No differences in 12-year DFS (65.7% [95% CI = 57.0% to 73.1%] in the GnRHa arm vs 69.2% [95% CI = 60.3% to 76.5%] in the control arm; HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.77) or in 12-year OS (81.2% [95% CI = 73.6% to 86.8%] in the GnRHa arm vs 81.3% [95% CI = 73.1% to 87.2%] in the control arm; HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.67 to 2.03) were observed. In patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, the hazard ratio was 1.02 (95% CI = 0.63 to 1.63) for DFS and 1.12 (95% CI = 0.59 to 2.11) for OS. In the GnRHa and control arms, 9 and 4 patients had a posttreatment pregnancy, respectively (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 0.66 to 6.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 trial provides reassuring results on the safety of GnRHa use during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer, including those with hormone receptor-positive disease.

摘要

背景

虽然在绝经前乳腺癌患者的化疗中使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)是保护卵巢功能的既定策略,但尚无长期安全性数据,这在激素受体阳性疾病患者中引起了一些担忧。关于其生育力保存潜力存在争议数据。

方法

化疗诱导的更年期预防:早期乳腺癌患者研究-意大利乳腺 6 组(PROMISE-GIM6)试验是一项多中心、随机、开放标签、III 期优效性试验,于 2003 年 10 月至 2008 年 1 月在意大利的 16 个中心进行。合格的患者被随机分配接受(新)辅助化疗(对照组)或联合 GnRHa 曲普瑞林(GnRHa 组)。主要计划终点是化疗诱导的卵巢早衰的发生率。事后终点是无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和治疗后妊娠。计算了危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

281 名随机分配的患者中,80.4%患有激素受体阳性乳腺癌。中位随访时间为 12.4 年(四分位距=11.3-13.2 年)。12 年 DFS 无差异(GnRHa 组为 65.7%[95%CI=57.0%至 73.1%],对照组为 69.2%[95%CI=60.3%至 76.5%];HR=1.16,95%CI=0.76 至 1.77)或 12 年 OS 无差异(GnRHa 组为 81.2%[95%CI=73.6%至 86.8%],对照组为 81.3%[95%CI=73.1%至 87.2%];HR=1.17,95%CI=0.67 至 2.03)。在激素受体阳性疾病患者中,DFS 的危险比为 1.02(95%CI=0.63 至 1.63),OS 的危险比为 1.12(95%CI=0.59 至 2.11)。GnRHa 组和对照组分别有 9 例和 4 例患者在治疗后怀孕(HR=2.14,95%CI=0.66 至 6.92)。

结论

PROMISE-GIM6 试验的最终分析结果令人放心,即化疗期间使用 GnRHa 作为保护绝经前早期乳腺癌患者卵巢功能的策略是安全的,包括激素受体阳性疾病患者。

相似文献

7
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian protection during cancer chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):77-86. doi: 10.1002/uog.18934. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
8
The risk of menopausal symptoms in premenopausal breast cancer patients and current pharmacological prevention strategies.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Oct;20(10):1163-1175. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1926980. Epub 2021 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Assessment and Fertility Counseling for Hereditary Gynecological Cancer Syndromes.
Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(17):e71206. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71206.
3
Interventions for fertility preservation in women with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 19;6:CD012891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012891.pub2.
4
[Impact of concurrent use of goserelin on the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in young breast cancer patients].
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Apr 18;57(2):291-297. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.02.011.
5
Bone Effects of Anti-Cancer Treatments in 2024.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2025 Mar 27;116(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s00223-025-01362-0.
6
Impact of Molecular Profiling on Therapy Management in Breast Cancer.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 23;13(17):4995. doi: 10.3390/jcm13174995.
7
Pharmacological methods for ovarian function and fertility preservation in women with cancer: A literature review.
Oncol Res. 2024 Jul 17;32(8):1309-1322. doi: 10.32604/or.2024.049743. eCollection 2024.
8
Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in Young Carriers With Breast Cancer.
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2024 Jun 14;18:11782234241261429. doi: 10.1177/11782234241261429. eCollection 2024.
10
Ovarian Suppression: Early Menopause and Late Effects.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Apr;25(4):523-542. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01190-8. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Preimplantation genetic testing for carriers of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jan;157:103201. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103201. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation.
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Nov 14;2020(4):hoaa052. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa052. eCollection 2020.
4
Clinical utility of genomic signatures in young breast cancer patients: a systematic review.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Sep 25;6:46. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-00188-3. eCollection 2020.
5
Fertility preservation and post-treatment pregnancies in post-pubertal cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1664-1678. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
6
ESO-ESMO 4th International Consensus Guidelines for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4).
Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):674-696. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.284. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Improving Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment Tailoring in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 20;38(12):1258-1267. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02242. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
8
Adding Ovarian Suppression to Tamoxifen for Premenopausal Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):434-443. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00126. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
9
Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2395-2405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904819. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验