Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
BJS Open. 2021 Nov 9;5(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab116.
Stoma-reversal surgery is associated with high postoperative morbidity, including wound complications and surgical-site infections (SSIs). This study aims to assess whether the application of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can improve wound healing compared with conventional wound dressing.
This was a single-centre, superiority, open-label, parallel, individually randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing stoma reversal were randomized (1 : 1) to receive NPWT or conventional wound dressing. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of wound complications and SSIs after stoma closure. The secondary endpoints were postoperative wound pain, rate of wound healing after 30 days from stoma closure, and wound aesthetic satisfaction.
Between June 2019 and January 2021, 50 patients were allocated to the NPWT group (all received NPWT, 49 were analysed); 50 patients were allocated to the conventional wound dressing group (48 received the treatment, 45 were analysed). No significant difference was found in wound-complication rate (10 per cent NPWT versus 16 per cent controls; odds ratio 0.61 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18 to 2.10), P = 0.542) and incisional SSI rate (8 per cent NPWT versus 7 per cent controls; odds ratio 1.24 (95 per cent c.i. 0.26 to 5.99), P = 1.000). The NPWT group showed less pain, higher aesthetic satisfaction (P < 0.0001), and a higher proportion of wound healing (92 versus 78 per cent; P = 0.081) compared with the control group.
NPWT does not reduce the incidence of SSI after stoma-reversal surgery compared with conventional wound dressing. However, NPWT improved the healing of uninfected wounds, reduced wound pain and led to better aesthetic outcomes.Registration number: NCT037812016 (clinicaltrials.gov).
肠造口还纳术后并发症发生率较高,包括伤口并发症和手术部位感染(SSI)。本研究旨在评估负压伤口治疗(NPWT)与常规伤口敷料相比是否能改善伤口愈合。
这是一项单中心、优效性、开放标签、平行、个体随机对照试验。接受肠造口还纳术的患者按 1:1 随机(分配)接受 NPWT 或常规伤口敷料。研究的主要终点是造口关闭后伤口并发症和 SSI 的发生率。次要终点是术后伤口疼痛、造口关闭后 30 天的伤口愈合率和伤口美观满意度。
2019 年 6 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,50 例患者被分配至 NPWT 组(均接受 NPWT,49 例进行了分析);50 例患者被分配至常规伤口敷料组(48 例接受治疗,45 例进行了分析)。两组的伤口并发症发生率(NPWT 组 10%,对照组 16%;比值比 0.61(95%可信区间 0.18 至 2.10),P=0.542)和切口 SSI 发生率(NPWT 组 8%,对照组 7%;比值比 1.24(95%可信区间 0.26 至 5.99),P=1.000)无显著差异。NPWT 组疼痛较轻,美观满意度较高(P<0.0001),未感染伤口愈合比例较高(92%比 78%;P=0.081)。
NPWT 与常规伤口敷料相比,不能降低肠造口还纳术后 SSI 的发生率。然而,NPWT 可促进未感染伤口愈合,减轻伤口疼痛,并带来更好的美观效果。注册号:NCT037812016(clinicaltrials.gov)。