Suppr超能文献

PREVENA(手术切口保护系统)在减少回肠造口或结肠造口术后手术部位感染中的应用:PRIC 研究方案。

Application of PREVENA (Surgical Incision Protection System) in reducing surgical site infections following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy: the PRIC study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, St James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 May;37(5):1215-1221. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04153-3. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

Abstract

AIM

There is a current lack of evidence in the literature to support the routine use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI) in the setting of ileostomy or colostomy reversal. The aim of this study is to examine whether routine NPWT confers a lower rate of SSI than conventional dressings following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy.

METHODS

The PRIC study is a randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-centre superiority trial to assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure confers a lower rate of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy when compared to conventional dressings. Participants will be consecutively identified and recruited. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio, to receive either the NPWT (PREVENA) dressings or conventional dressings which will be applied immediately upon completion of surgery. PREVENA dressings will remain applied for a duration of 7 days. Surgical wounds will then be examined on post-operative day seven as well as during follow-up appointments in OPD for any evidence of SSI. In the interim, public health nurses (PHN) will provide out-patient support services incorporating wound assessment and care as part of a routine basis. Study investigators will liaise with PHN to gather the relevant data in relation to the time to wound healing. Our primary endpoint is the incidence of SSI within 30 days of stoma reversal. Secondary endpoints include measuring time to wound healing, evaluating wound healing and aesthetics and assessing patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The PRIC study will assess whether routine NPWT following wound closure is superior to conventional dressings in the reduction of SSI following reversal of ileostomy or colostomy and ascertain whether routine NPWT should be considered the new standard of care.

摘要

目的

目前文献中缺乏证据支持负压伤口治疗(NPWT)常规用于降低肠造口或肠造口还纳术后手术部位感染(SSI)的风险。本研究旨在探讨肠造口或肠造口还纳术后伤口闭合时常规使用 NPWT 是否比常规敷料降低 SSI 的发生率。

方法

PRIC 研究是一项随机、对照、开放标签、多中心优效性试验,旨在评估肠造口或肠造口还纳术后伤口闭合时常规使用 NPWT 是否比常规敷料降低 SSI 的发生率。参与者将被连续识别和招募。符合条件的参与者将按照 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受 NPWT(PREVENA)敷料或常规敷料,这些敷料将在手术后立即应用。PREVENA 敷料将持续使用 7 天。术后第 7 天以及在 OPD 的随访预约中,将检查手术伤口是否有 SSI 的任何证据。在此期间,公共卫生护士(PHN)将提供门诊支持服务,包括伤口评估和护理,作为常规基础的一部分。研究调查人员将与 PHN 联系,收集与伤口愈合时间相关的相关数据。我们的主要终点是肠造口还纳后 30 天内 SSI 的发生率。次要终点包括测量伤口愈合时间、评估伤口愈合和美观以及评估患者满意度。

结论

PRIC 研究将评估肠造口或肠造口还纳术后伤口闭合时常规使用 NPWT 是否优于常规敷料,以降低 SSI 的发生率,并确定常规 NPWT 是否应被视为新的护理标准。

相似文献

4
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 12;3(3):CD014763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014763.pub2.
6
9
[Efficacy comparison of purse-string vs. linear closure of the wound following stoma reversal: systematic review and meta-analysis].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1188-1195. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.016.
10
The effectiveness of negative-pressure wound therapy for wound healing after stoma reversal: a randomized control study.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Sep;105(3):126-132. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.3.126. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

本文引用的文献

5
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Nov;25(11):1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
9
Considerations in Stoma Reversal.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Jul;30(3):172-177. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598157. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries.
J Hosp Infect. 2017 May;96(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验