Vasile Victor A, Istrate Sinziana, Iancu Raluca C, Piticescu Roxana M, Cursaru Laura M, Schmetterer Leopold, Garhöfer Gerhard, Cherecheanu Alina Popa
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, District 5, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Emergency Hospital, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;15(6):2183. doi: 10.3390/ma15062183.
The reconstruction of an orbit after complex craniofacial fractures can be extremely demanding. For satisfactory functional and aesthetic results, it is necessary to restore the orbital walls and the craniofacial skeleton using various types of materials. The reconstruction materials can be divided into autografts (bone or cartilage tissue) or allografts (metals, ceramics, or plastic materials, and combinations of these materials). Over time, different types of materials have been used, considering characteristics such as their stability, biocompatibility, cost, safety, and intraoperative flexibility. Although the ideal material for orbital reconstruction could not be unanimously identified, much progress has been achieved in recent years. In this article, we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of each category of reconstruction materials. We also provide an update on improvements in material properties through various modern processing techniques. Good results in reconstructive surgery of the orbit require both material and technological innovations.
复杂颅面骨折后的眼眶重建极具挑战性。为获得满意的功能和美学效果,有必要使用各种材料修复眶壁和颅面骨骼。重建材料可分为自体移植物(骨或软骨组织)或同种异体移植物(金属、陶瓷或塑料材料,以及这些材料的组合)。随着时间的推移,考虑到材料的稳定性、生物相容性、成本、安全性和术中灵活性等特性,人们使用了不同类型的材料。尽管尚未能一致确定理想的眼眶重建材料,但近年来已取得了很大进展。在本文中,我们总结了各类重建材料的优缺点。我们还介绍了通过各种现代加工技术在材料性能改进方面的最新情况。眼眶重建手术的良好效果需要材料和技术的创新。