Olmos-Vega Francisco M, Stalmeijer Renée E, Varpio Lara, Kahlke Renate
Anesthesiology Department, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Department of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
Qualitative research relies on nuanced judgements that require researcher reflexivity, yet reflexivity is often addressed superficially or overlooked completely during the research process. In this AMEE Guide, we define reflexivity as a set of continuous, collaborative, and multifaceted practices through which researchers self-consciously critique, appraise, and evaluate how their subjectivity and context influence the research processes. We frame reflexivity as a way to embrace and value researchers' subjectivity. We also describe the purposes that reflexivity can have depending on different paradigmatic choices. We then address how researchers can account for the significance of the intertwined personal, interpersonal, methodological, and contextual factors that bring research into being and offer specific strategies for communicating reflexivity in research dissemination. With the growth of qualitative research in health professions education, it is essential that qualitative researchers carefully consider their paradigmatic stance and use reflexive practices to align their decisions at all stages of their research. We hope this Guide will illuminate such a path, demonstrating how reflexivity can be used to develop and communicate rigorous qualitative research.
定性研究依赖于细微的判断,这需要研究者进行反思,但在研究过程中,反思往往只是被表面地提及,或者被完全忽视。在本AMEE指南中,我们将反思定义为一系列持续、协作且多方面的实践,通过这些实践,研究者自觉地批判、评估和评价他们的主观性及背景如何影响研究过程。我们将反思构建为一种接纳并重视研究者主观性的方式。我们还描述了反思根据不同范式选择可能具有的目的。然后,我们探讨研究者如何考量那些使研究得以开展的个人、人际、方法和背景因素相互交织所具有的重要性,并提供在研究传播中传达反思的具体策略。随着健康职业教育中定性研究的发展,定性研究者必须仔细考虑他们的范式立场,并运用反思性实践使其在研究的各个阶段做出的决策保持一致。我们希望本指南能阐明这样一条路径,展示反思如何能够用于开展和传达严谨的定性研究。