Suppr超能文献

颅脑创伤患者晶体液与生理盐水的平衡对比:一项临床试验的二次分析。

Balanced Crystalloid versus Saline in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis of a Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Section of Acute Care Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2022 Sep;39(17-18):1159-1167. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0465.

Abstract

Balanced crystalloids may improve outcomes compared with saline for some critically ill adults. Lower tonicity of balanced crystalloids could worsen cerebral edema in patients with intracranial pathology. The effect of balanced crystalloids versus saline on clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires further study. We planned an subgroup analysis of TBI patients enrolled in the pragmatic, cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover Isotonic Solutions and Major Adverse Renal Events Trial (SMART) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02444988, NCT02547779). Primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital discharge disposition (home, facility, death). Regression models adjusted for pre-specified baseline covariates compared outcomes. TBI patients assigned to balanced crystalloids ( = 588) and saline ( = 569) had similar baseline characteristics including Injury Severity Score 19 (10); mean maximum head/neck Abbreviated Injury Score, 3.4 (1.0). Isotonic crystalloid volume administered between intensive care unit admission and first of hospital discharge or 30 days was 2037 (3470) mL and 1723 (2923) mL in the balanced crystalloids and saline groups, respectively ( = 0.18). During the study period, 94 (16%) and 82 (14%) patients (16%) died in the balanced crystalloid and saline groups, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 1.75;  = 0.913). Patients in the balanced crystalloid group were more likely to die or be discharged to another medical facility (aOR 1.38 [1.02-1.86];  = 0.04). Overall, balanced crystalloids were associated with worse discharge disposition in critically injured patients with TBI compared with saline. The confidence intervals cannot exclude a clinically relevant increase in mortality when balanced crystalloids are used for patients with TBI.

摘要

平衡晶体液可能比生理盐水更能改善某些危重症成人的预后。平衡晶体液的低渗透压可能会使颅内病变患者的脑水肿恶化。平衡晶体液与生理盐水对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者临床结局的影响还需要进一步研究。我们计划对纳入实用、集群随机、多次交叉等张溶液和主要不良肾脏事件试验(SMART)的 TBI 患者进行亚组分析(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02444988,NCT02547779)。主要结局为 30 天院内死亡率。次要结局包括医院出院去向(回家、机构、死亡)。回归模型根据预先指定的基线协变量调整了结果。接受平衡晶体液(n=588)和生理盐水(n=569)的 TBI 患者具有相似的基线特征,包括损伤严重程度评分 19(10);平均最大头部/颈部简明损伤评分 3.4(1.0)。在 ICU 入院至首次出院或 30 天内,平衡晶体液组和生理盐水组的等渗晶体液用量分别为 2037(3470)mL 和 1723(2923)mL(n=0.18)。在研究期间,平衡晶体液组和生理盐水组分别有 94(16%)和 82(14%)患者(n=16%)死亡(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.03;95%置信区间[CI],0.60 至 1.75;n=0.913)。平衡晶体液组患者更有可能死亡或转至其他医疗机构(aOR 1.38 [1.02-1.86];n=0.04)。总体而言,与生理盐水相比,平衡晶体液与 TBI 重症患者的预后较差出院去向相关。置信区间不能排除当 TBI 患者使用平衡晶体液时死亡率会出现临床相关增加。

相似文献

3
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in the Intensive Care Unit. The SALT Randomized Trial.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 15;195(10):1362-1372. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201607-1345OC.
6
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Noncritically Ill Adults.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):819-828. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711586. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
7
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-839. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711584. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
10
Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Sepsis. A Secondary Analysis of the SMART Clinical Trial.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec 15;200(12):1487-1495. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201903-0557OC.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies in Traumatic Brain Injury.
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 5;14(17):6289. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176289.
2
The association of fluid balance with traumatic brain injury outcomes: A systematic review.
J Intensive Med. 2025 Mar 24;5(3):276-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
4
Fluid management strategies in critically ill patients with ARDS: a narrative review.
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 20;30(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02661-w.
5
Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Trigger after Acute Brain Injury: More than Just Higher Blood Oxygen Content.
Neurotrauma Rep. 2025 Mar 19;6(1):257-260. doi: 10.1089/neur.2025.0008. eCollection 2025.
6
Damage control resuscitation: how it's done and where we can improve. A view of the Brazilian reality according to trauma professionals.
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2025 Jan 13;51:e20243785. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243785-en. eCollection 2025.
7
Managing Intracranial Pressure Crisis.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s11910-024-01392-5.
8
Which Intravenous Isotonic Fluid Offers Better Outcomes for Patients with a Brain Injury?
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Apr;42(2):715-721. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02139-3. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
9
The choice of crystalloid type in the intensive care unit is likely more complex than expected: should doubt benefit the patient?
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul;50(7):1206-1207. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07486-5. Epub 2024 May 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验