Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 13;51(5):1396-1407. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac083.
Unlike other countries, South Korea did not implement a large-scale lockdown or closure of businesses to manage the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but relied on changes in population behaviours and early isolation and treatment of patients. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of such alternative strategies on the mortality of the general population.
Mortality and monthly population data from 2013 to 2020 were obtained. A quasi-Poisson regression model adjusting for age structure, seasonality and time was used to evaluate whether underlying trends for monthly mortality rate have changed with the pandemic. Stratification analyses based on sex and location of deaths (inside vs outside of medical facilities) were conducted.
The risk estimates showed no changes in non-accidental mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic [relative risk (RR) (95% confidence interval, 95% CI), slope change: 1.00 (1.00, 1.01), step change: 0.99 (0.97, 1.01)] compared with those before the pandemic. In cause-specific analysis, there was an abrupt and sustained decrease in the mortality rate of respiratory diseases [RR (95% CI), step change: 0.81 (0.77, 0.84)]. In the analysis of deaths by location, an increase in non-accidental mortality [RR (95% CI), slope change: 1.01 (1.01, 1.02), step change: 1.16 (1.11, 1.22)] and several cause-specific mortalities was observed outside of medical facilities.
The non-accidental mortality rate in South Korea for the first year of the pandemic followed the historical trends. However, there was a decrease in mortality associated with respiratory diseases, and an increase in mortality occurring outside of medical facilities. The findings may be attributed to changes in public behaviours, and availability of medical resources during the pandemic.
与其他国家不同,韩国在管理 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行时并未实施大规模封锁或关闭企业,而是依靠改变人口行为和早期隔离及治疗患者。评估这种替代策略对普通人群死亡率的有效性很重要。
获取了 2013 年至 2020 年的死亡率和每月人口数据。使用调整了年龄结构、季节性和时间的拟泊松回归模型来评估每月死亡率的潜在趋势是否因大流行而发生变化。根据性别和死亡地点(医疗设施内与医疗设施外)进行分层分析。
风险估计显示,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,非意外死亡率没有变化[相对风险(RR)(95%置信区间,95%CI),斜率变化:1.00(1.00,1.01),阶跃变化:0.99(0.97,1.01)]与大流行前相比。在死因特异性分析中,呼吸道疾病死亡率急剧且持续下降[RR(95%CI),阶跃变化:0.81(0.77,0.84)]。在按地点划分的死亡分析中,非意外死亡率[RR(95%CI),斜率变化:1.01(1.01,1.02),阶跃变化:1.16(1.11,1.22)]和几种死因特异性死亡率在医疗设施外有所增加。
韩国大流行第一年的非意外死亡率遵循历史趋势。然而,与呼吸道疾病相关的死亡率有所下降,而医疗设施外的死亡率有所上升。这些发现可能归因于大流行期间公众行为和医疗资源的变化。