Suppr超能文献

基于网络的头痛诊断问卷的开发和验证。

Development and validation of a web-based headache diagnosis questionnaire.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.

Hankook Research, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 29;12(1):7032. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11008-y.

Abstract

Information technology advances may help in conducting epidemiological studies using web-based surveys. Questionnaire-based headache diagnosis should be validated against the doctor's diagnosis. This study aimed to develop and validate a web-based diagnostic questionnaire for migraine, probable migraine (PM), and tension-type headache (TTH). We constructed a seven-item questionnaire for diagnosing migraine, PM, and TTH. A web-based survey was conducted among adults aged 20-59 years; migraine, PM, and TTH were diagnosed based on the responses. Validation interview was performed via telephone by a neurologist within 1 month after the web-based interview. Finally, 256 participants completed both web-based survey and validation interview. Of them, 121 (47.3%), 65 (25.4%), 61 (23.8%), and 9 (3.5%) were diagnosed with migraine, PM, TTH, and unclassified headache (UH), respectively in the web-based survey, whereas 119 (46.5%), 60 (23.4%), 74 (28.9%), 2 (0.8%), and 1 (0.4%) were diagnosed with migraine, PM, TTH, UH, and primary stabbing headache, respectively in the validation interview. The best agreement was found in migraine (sensitivity: 92.6%; specificity: 94.8%; kappa coefficient: 0.875), followed by TTH (sensitivity: 78.4%; specificity: 98.4%; kappa coefficient: 0.809). PM showed the least agreement (sensitivity: 85.0%; specificity: 92.9%; kappa coefficient: 0.757). In conclusion, our questionnaire is valid in identifying these headache disorders.

摘要

信息技术的进步可能有助于利用基于网络的调查进行流行病学研究。基于问卷的头痛诊断应与医生的诊断相验证。本研究旨在开发和验证一种用于偏头痛、可能偏头痛(PM)和紧张型头痛(TTH)的基于网络的诊断问卷。我们构建了一个用于诊断偏头痛、PM 和 TTH 的七项问卷。对 20-59 岁的成年人进行了基于网络的调查;根据回答诊断偏头痛、PM 和 TTH。在网络调查后的 1 个月内,由神经病学家通过电话进行验证访谈。最后,256 名参与者完成了网络调查和验证访谈。其中,121 人(47.3%)、65 人(25.4%)、61 人(23.8%)和 9 人(3.5%)在网络调查中分别被诊断为偏头痛、PM、TTH 和未分类头痛(UH),而 119 人(46.5%)、60 人(23.4%)、74 人(28.9%)、2 人(0.8%)和 1 人(0.4%)在验证访谈中分别被诊断为偏头痛、PM、TTH、UH 和原发性刺痛性头痛。在偏头痛方面发现了最佳的一致性(敏感性:92.6%;特异性:94.8%;kappa 系数:0.875),其次是 TTH(敏感性:78.4%;特异性:98.4%;kappa 系数:0.809)。PM 的一致性最低(敏感性:85.0%;特异性:92.9%;kappa 系数:0.757)。总之,我们的问卷在识别这些头痛障碍方面是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/519b/9055052/7667b8719751/41598_2022_11008_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验