Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Heart Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Interventional Medicine and Innovation, National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul;100(1):72-82. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30217. Epub 2022 May 2.
Several studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and/or aspirin, possibly leading to cardiovascular events.
We aimed to investigate the association between PPI and clinical outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy or conventional antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
This is a subanalysis of the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS trial, comparing the experimental antiplatelet arm (23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]) with the reference arm (12-month aspirin monotherapy following 12-month DAPT) after PCI. Patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCEs: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization) and its components were assessed stratified by PPI use as a time-dependent covariate in patients with the experiment or reference antiplatelet arm.
Among 15,839 patients, 2115 patients (13.5%) experienced POCE at 2 years. In the reference arm, the use of PPIs was independently associated with POCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-1.44) and its individual components, whereas it was not in the experimental arm (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.92-1.19; p = 0.035). During the second-year follow-up, patients taking aspirin with PPIs had a significantly higher risk of POCE compared to those on aspirin without PPIs (HR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27-1.94), whereas the risk did not differ significantly irrespective of PPI in ticagrelor monotherapy group (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.83-1.28; p = 0.008).
In contrast to conventional antiplatelet strategy, there were no evidence suggesting the interaction between ticagrelor monotherapy and PPIs on increased cardiovascular events, which should be confirmed in further studies.
多项研究表明质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)可能会降低氯吡格雷和/或阿司匹林的抗血小板作用,从而可能导致心血管事件。
我们旨在研究在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受替格瑞洛单药或常规抗血小板治疗的患者中,PPI 与临床结局之间的关联。
这是随机 GLOBAL LEADERS 试验的亚分析,比较了实验性抗血小板治疗组(DAPT 后 1 个月替格瑞洛单药治疗 23 个月)和参考治疗组(DAPT 后 12 个月阿司匹林单药治疗 12 个月)。在接受实验或参考抗血小板治疗的患者中,根据 PPI 使用情况作为时间依赖性协变量,评估以患者为导向的复合终点(POCE:全因死亡率、心肌梗死、卒中和/或再次血运重建)及其组成部分。
在 15839 例患者中,2115 例(13.5%)患者在 2 年内发生 POCE。在参考治疗组中,PPI 的使用与 POCE 独立相关(风险比[HR]:1.27;95%置信区间[CI]:1.12-1.44)及其各个组成部分相关,而在实验治疗组中则无相关性(HR:1.04;95% CI:0.92-1.19;p=0.035)。在第二年的随访期间,与未服用 PPI 的患者相比,同时服用阿司匹林和 PPI 的患者 POCE 的风险显著升高(HR:1.57;95% CI:1.27-1.94),而在替格瑞洛单药治疗组中,无论是否服用 PPI,风险均无显著差异(HR:1.03;95% CI:0.83-1.28;p=0.008)。
与常规抗血小板治疗策略相反,没有证据表明替格瑞洛单药治疗与 PPI 之间存在增加心血管事件的相互作用,这需要在进一步的研究中证实。