Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Apr;27(4):780-788. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2089628. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
Previous investigations of cognitive aging have mainly focused on structural aspects of social relations (e.g. network size and composition), thereby neglecting the role of qualitative aspects of social relations. The current longitudinal study examined sex-specific differences in verbal memory decline by measures of perceived relationship quality (social support/strain) by relationship type.
In the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), 10,109 participants aged 50-89 years were assessed at wave 1 (baseline: 2002-03) and followed to wave 9 (2017-18). Verbal memory was assessed by immediate and delayed word-recall tasks. Social support/strain was measured by relationship type (spouse; children; family; friends). Random effects within-between (REWB) modelling was used to separate between- and within-person effects. We estimated associations between social support/strain and (1) baseline levels of memory (main effects), and (2) rate of decline in memory (interaction with time-since-baseline).
Longitudinal associations were most prominent for men, specific to relationship type, and showed between- rather than within-person effects. Among men, higher spousal strain was associated with faster memory decline (β = -0.043; 95% CI [-0.084, -0.002]; = .039), whilst greater support from children was associated with slower decline (β = 0.020; 95% CI [0.002, 0.039]; = .033). Men with higher strain from friends showed lower baseline memory (β = -0.382; 95% CI [-0.627, -0.137]; =.002) and faster decline (β = -0.047; 95% CI [-0.095, 0.000]; = .051).
Between-person differences in social support/strain were modestly associated with memory decline, especially among men.
先前关于认知老化的研究主要集中在社会关系的结构方面(例如,网络规模和组成),从而忽略了社会关系的定性方面的作用。本纵向研究通过关系类型来衡量感知关系质量(社会支持/紧张),以考察言语记忆衰退方面的性别差异。
在英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)中,对 10109 名年龄在 50-89 岁的参与者进行了评估,评估时间为第 1 波(基线:2002-03 年),随访至第 9 波(2017-18 年)。言语记忆通过即时和延迟单词回忆任务进行评估。社会支持/紧张通过关系类型(配偶;子女;家庭;朋友)来衡量。使用个体间-个体内(REWB)建模来分离个体间和个体内效应。我们估计了社会支持/紧张与(1)记忆的基线水平(主要效应)和(2)记忆下降率(与自基线以来的时间的交互作用)之间的关联。
纵向关联在男性中最为明显,特定于关系类型,并且表现出个体间而非个体内的效应。在男性中,配偶关系紧张与记忆衰退速度更快相关(β=-0.043;95%CI[-0.084,-0.002]; =.039),而子女的支持与较慢的下降相关(β=0.020;95%CI[0.002,0.039]; =.033)。与朋友关系紧张程度较高的男性,其记忆基线水平较低(β=-0.382;95%CI[-0.627,-0.137]; =.002),且下降速度较快(β=-0.047;95%CI[-0.095,0.000]; =.051)。
社会支持/紧张的个体间差异与记忆衰退有适度的关联,尤其是在男性中。